User talk:68.197.116.79

November 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The ends justify the means, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 04:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020

Hello, your edits at Brothers of Italy are becoming disruptive. You’ve been reverted multiple times and have not yet come to the talk page (where the subject of your edits has recently been somewhat discussed). If you persist you may be taken to the administrator noticeboard for edit warring. I advise you either start a discussion at the talk page, or simply cease attempts to have your edit included. Nigel Abe (talk) 19:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That turns out not to be the case. I edited that article exactly once, only to restore some material removed due to a stated lack of reliable sources. I added a reliable source which uses "ultranationalist" to refer to Brothers of Italy.

You owe me a retraction and an apology, good sir. 68.197.116.79 (talk) 01:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Trolling and beating a dead horse. Drmies (talk) 01:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You are not a neutral party. So far, you've ignored three reliable sources in a row and repeatedly threatened and insulted me. If you block me, I'll have your badge taken away for abuse of power. 68.197.116.79 (talk) 01:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you hadn’t been reverted 4 times now and been acting highly uncivil on top of arguing for a notion that in itself is ludicrous, I would sympathize, but because of these things if you take drmies to a noticeboard I’ll happily come along too to not only testify on his behalf but let the admins know about your own conduct in this matter. Nigel Abe (talk) 03:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Except that I haven't been reverted 4 times. I was reverted exactly once, and then you accused me of being someone else because you seem to think that all IP's are the same person, even when they're on opposite sides of the globe. Instead, you ignore the citations I've found through my research and blast me with unwarranted incivility and hostility, not to mention the endless threats. Enough already.

Get off my talk page and don't come back unless you start with the well-deserved apology that you still owe me. Go away. 68.197.116.79 (talk) 18:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel

Well, he turned out to be the sock puppet of a blocked user. If you look at his talk page, you'll find that User:Drmies apparently abused his administrative privileges (again), this time by locking the page after insulting and taunting me. Amazing. 68.197.116.79 (talk) 21:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I took his advice.[1] 68.197.116.79 (talk) 21:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And had the expected results. 68.197.116.79 (talk) 00:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WHINE. Johnuniq (talk) 03:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's insulting and you should apologize. 68.197.116.79 (talk) 04:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Complaining about editor behavior is appropriate – at a relevant noticeboard when that behavior is contrary to Wikipedia policies and guidelines and harms the project. But editors should not complain just for the sake of complaining, nor as therapy or catharsis, but to get help in guiding an errant editor back on track with the project's fundamental principles."

I complained on the relevant noticeboard because Drmies' behavior was contrary to Wikipedia policies and harms the project. My stated goal was to help in guiding the errant editor back on track with the project's fundamentental principles.

Yet you came here to beat a dead horse and insult me. Do not return. 68.197.116.79 (talk) 04:31, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why we fight

For those who missed it, here's how a mature, adult Wikipedia administrator behaves:

Aw boohoo. I think you misspelled "littterally". Go and whine away at WP:AN and see what the real admins have to say. It's funny--in your own way, you're no better than this sock. Drmies (talk) 21:30, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, this is perfectly fine and I should be blocked for complaining. How I could possibly argue with that conclusion?! 68.197.116.79 (talk) 04:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.