User talk:AWarlordFromYarmouk

AWarlordFromYarmouk, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AWarlordFromYarmouk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! – Levivich 20:11, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

You have been "edit warring" at Pittsburgh synagogue shooting and Maram Susli. Please follow the procedure outlined at WP:BRD instead of edit warring. Thank you. – Levivich 20:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Maram Susli shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. If you make a change to an article, and another editor reverts it, please do not reinstate your original edit. Instead, start a discussion about your change on the article's talk page (for example, Talk:Maram Susli), and seek consensus for your changes, before reinstating those changes. You have been repeatedly reinstating your edits at Maram Susli, Umar, and Pittsburgh synagogue shooting; if you continue, you may be blocked from editing. For more information, please see WP:BRD. Please let me know if you have any questions, or ask at the teahouse. Thank you. – Levivich 16:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Cunanan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 18:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Cunanan, you may be blocked from editing. Zinnober9 (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Communication on Wikipedia

Hi AWarlordFromYarmouk, thank you for your contributions.

Please use edit summaries to describe what you do.
Please respond to other users' messages. If you do not understand a message, please say so. See Help:Talk pages for help. See WP:THREAD for examples.
If communicating in English is not possible, please consider using a different Wikipedia in a language you are more comfortable with.

Your communication and editing style are currently perceived as problematic by multiple editors. Disruptive editing is not acceptable.

When other users talk to you, please respond to them. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Rob Lowe

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rob-lowe-flew-on-911-terrorist-dry-run_n_857313, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Please read WP:OVERLINK and stop overlinking names as you did on Planning of the September 11 attacks Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 11:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Zinnober9 (talk) 18:39, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting ‎, you may be blocked from editing.
*Despite receiving multiple warnings you have consistently utilized inaccurate or nonsensical edit summaries.
*Despite being warned about your editorial behavior, you have persisted in overlinking unneeded phrases and words.
Please stop. Shearonink (talk) 03:14, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sister Souljah. General Ization ^Talk 19:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 19:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When you are able to edit again, I suggest (a) communicating with other users and (b) using actual edit summaries instead of random strings of characters. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:26, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Mary Pinchot Meyer does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Again, you are not correctly using the edit summary. PLEASE communicate with other users and QUIT using random strings of letters in your summaries. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 02:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]