User talk:CircuitCityTeleVision

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, CircuitCityTeleVision, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article tagging

Hi. The article had been tagged by another user as being somewhat promotional in nature. There is an existing article on the system as well, so a separate article would have been redundant. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just to let you know, when you make a redirect you don't need to actually state that they are being redirected. If it's done right, they won't even see the page. Templarion 愛 05:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 06:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Queens Crossing

A tag has been placed on Queens Crossing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Queens Crossing

I have nominated Queens Crossing, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queens Crossing. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have had 4 months to bring it to Wikipedia standard - especially related to notability. Thanks for reminding me to take a second look. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your best chance to bring back the article would be to re-write it in your own personal test area. Write it well, ensure it meets the notability standards. Ensure it has at least two 3rd party reliable sources. Once it's 100% ready to go, contact an admin ... or someone you trust ... to have a look, and ask them if it's okay to bring into article space. If they think it's now ok, ask them to move it for you.

As far as the username issue, you can go to WP:CHU and look at the process of changing names - one little warning, a lot of people who have used a community as a username have gone on to try and work on articles related to that community - that becomes an obvious conflict of interest. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]