User talk:Darkwraith2012

Fork

Anything you have to say about capture the flag should be added to the capture the flag article. Your text is below. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are three versions of capture the flag. The first you try to capture you enemies’ flag and bring it to your base. Or you could play where you bring your flag to the enemies’ base. Of their could only be one flag in the middle where both teams race to get it and bring it back. In all but the last one there is a line in the middle making territory, if you cross in to enemy territory you can get tagged, then go to jail. While in jail you must always touch the jail, if a teammate can touch the jail you both go free write back to your territory, no grabbing the flag in the process. Also there can be 1 jail guard, their can be no one guarding the flag within 7 feet. No flags maybe thrown or concealed. It is also illegal to fake being in jail. If you rough house of be physical against someone or you go automatically to jail.

Speedy deletion nomination of Andryck

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Andryck, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Poison has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Laws of the Game. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.--Stepheng3 (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Advanced risk

A tag has been placed on Advanced risk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. macbookair3140 (talk) 22:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ginger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Andy Dingley (talk) 00:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Township (South Africa)

I rolled back your recent deletion since you removed some cited material. Can I ask why you removed that? --Nuujinn (talk) 20:25, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--John (talk) 22:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]