User talk:ESkog/Archive7

Index of Talk Page archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F May 19-December 22, 2010 - December 23, 2010 - November 10, 2011 - December 8, 2011 - October 8, 2012 - October 18, 2012 - May 27, 2013 - May 30, 2013 - March 26, 2014 - January 29, 2015 - March 15, 2017

rec.sport.pro-wrestling

Master Of RSPW is a suspected sockpuppet of Chadbryant, which in itself makes the account questionable. However, that aside, the changes this person has made to rec.sport.pro-wrestling are both invalid and inaccurate, and were decided lonnnng ago by Wikipedia administrators to be of inappropriate use to the entry, due to their lack of content, amount of opinionated material, amount of personal attacks, and invalid outside resources used as internal and external links. All I am attempting to do is ensure that this version is NOT used for rec.sport.pro-wrestling. If this means that by Wikipedia definition on a technicality I am in violation of the Wikipedia three-revert rule, then I apologize. What you must realize is that the LAST time this occurred, Mr. Bryant was behind it as well. It is, in fact, his version which was declared essentially null and void by Wikipedia administrators; thus, it comes as no surprise that his sockpuppet...excuse me, SUSPECTED sockpuppet Master Of RSPW is causing trouble through this entry. This is not the first time Mr. Bryant OR Master Of RSPW has done this, nor, I suspect, shall it be the last, given the extensive abusive behavior of both (or the one, depending on your point of view) parties/party. I do, however, apologize if it seems that I am being a "vandal" or "sockpuppet" or whatever lame excuse either one of those parties is attempting to use to justify their (invalid) revertings. It is mostly an edit war that certain individuals seem to prefer to engage in with the intent of causing trouble. --FARVA 05:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with the above post. It is rather obvious that Chadbryant (talk · contribs) and Master Of RSPW (talk · contribs) are one and the same (see each user's contribs for circumstantial proof), despite both user's claims to the opposite. Mr. Bryant's edits, using both accounts, are rather frivilous and go against the consensus of other users, as in the article for Nashville Municipal Auditorium. --Zpb52 09:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You concur with a fellow Southerner? What a shock! You do know that FARVA is the "DickWitham" troll that has been blocked under dozens of screen names for abuse, right? Given the fact that you're most likely the anonymous Alabaman who vandalized my user page, I'm not really sure you care about the truth, or being aligned with the right side. Master Of RSPW 16:17, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the above comments speak for themselves. Master Of RSPW, AKA Chadbryant, has no intention of ever making a positive contribution to wikipedia. His veiled insults/personal attacks above are proof positive of this, and his paranoia fits in with Chadbryant's behavior as well (". . . care about the truth . . . "being aligned with the right side"). The sooner both of them are blocked and banned, the better. --FARVA 07:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Fingerprint

Why deleted you Microsoft Fingerprint 6 March [1]. The article provided useful information. 1() 07:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Master of RSPW

Despite your warning on his talk page, User:Master Of RSPW continues to revert the entry for rec.sport.pro-wrestling.

[[2]] [[3]] [[4]] [[5]] [[6]]

Since this user is the sockpuppet of User:Chadbryant, I expect more edits to continue. TruthCrusader 16:34, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The checkuser needs to be run ASAP. You need to be proven wrong and silenced. Master Of RSPW 16:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YOU need to stop vandalising user pages, reverting to incorrect articles, adding personal insults and incivility to edit comments and user pages, and really just a whole host of other bad behavior. Let he who is without a three meat pizza throw the first stone. --FARVA 07:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you folks mind taking this somewhere other than my user talk page, please? (ESkog)^(Talk) 08:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bechna.com

This site is among the top 5 classifieds sites in India. Some of the others are portals that have classifieds in India like rediff.com, sulekha.com and timesclassifieds.com. It is in the top 50,000 ranking in Alexa and ranked 49th in the classifieds category by ranking.com Similar to craigslist and unlike the other classifieds sites in India, bechna is a pure classifieds site. Requesting the deleting msg be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bluesargam (talk • contribs) 02:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

BBIH

You blocked this user for a month for bo good reason. It was not actually meant in a bad-faith way that I should show you who is boss, infact, you have proven to be a life-ruiner tonight. I demand the unblocking of that account as I mean to make good edits with it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 680 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't know; assuming he promises to behave himself (and does in the interim), I don't see why he can't be unblocked in a couple weeks. One would, however, have to keep an eye on him. —BorgHunter ^ubx (talk) 03:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infact, the account should be unblocked now. I hope you are considering it. (and note also, I am not trolling with the socks, infact I never am, and I am a perfectly good contributor.}Elcik 03:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so, is it time to remove the block.Dirdfo 04:00, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have to use socks to communicate. Stop blocking them. Remove the block on BBIH by March 16.Roving raider 04:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

a) You do not have to use socks to communicate. You can e-mail an admin.

b) Being insulting ("you have proven to be a life-ruiner tonight"), making demands, and issuing ultimatums are not good ways to get yourself unblocked.

Hbackman 05:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Streamlight article

On March 6 you deleted the article Streamlight: [7].

Could you please undelete that or let's discuss the problem with the article? There are many other similar articles on flashlight companies, watch companies, etc. If there's some advertising or spam problem, I'll be happy to fix that. I have no association with the company, flashlights are just a hobby. Streamlight is probably the most notable flashlight manufacturer outside Maglite, so I was surprised to see it deleted. Joema 13:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thanks for participating in my RfA. It passed with a final tally of 98/13/10, just two short of making WP:100. If you need my help with anything, don't hesitate to ask.

Naconkantari e|t||c|m 23:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Input Appreciated

I'd much appreciate your input in the very demoralizing (for me) flame war that has developed between myself an another user which is currently being played out on WP:PAIN. This user piled on your comment on my talk page in what I felt was an unnecessary as well as unnecessarily hostile fashion, Then I objected and it has been downhill from there. I've always admired your civility in even the most heated situations but I see that that trait is far from universal among the veteran users of this site. I find this whole thing very painful and frankly it has led me to wonder whether there is any point in further contributions here. This and the ongoing, pointless confrontations in naked short selling have been draining and this is, for me, something resembling the "last straw." Anyway, thanks for listening. A response on this talk page would be appreciated.--Tomstoner 18:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk:152.163.100.9 anon and deletions

rv - the warnings were removed by Pathoschild as very very old

you assertions that User:Pathoschild deleted those entries because they are very very old is mistaken for two reason:

1) they were repeatedly deleted by the anon himself 15 February 2006

2) they are not "very very old"--the last entry was 14 feb, 2006 and the deletions occured 8 days later on feb 22, 2006.

We have a repeated vandal which you are shielding. Deleting vandalism notices is considered vandalism. Travb 23:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not calling you a vandal, just explaining policy in case you are not familar with it. My mistake, you are correct, I am sorry Pathoschild did delete those warnings this time. I have followed this particular aol vandal for two months, and was just in the process of writing up a vandalism in progress because this user deleted all the messages on three AOL anon talk pages.

I will talk to User:Pathoschild about his edits, and if I can archive those warnings. I find if ironic that User:Pathoschild did what the vandal attempted to do not 7 days before 15 February 2006

--delete all of the warning entries.Travb 23:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zmmz

I've told Zmmz that if you're willing to go along with it, I'd unblock him on the condition that he not edit Persian people for the duration of your 48-hour block. This would allow him to participate in the ongoing mediation of that page on the talk page. However, I'll only do this if you sign on, so let me know. Thanks. Chick Bowen 00:09, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good. I'm curious to see what he says. Thanks. Chick Bowen 00:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do NOT vandalize.

Please read the comments in my edit before accusing me of vandalizing.

I was doing the user a favour and archiving his talk page. If you had looked at the comment I left in the edit (though I left no edit summary), you would have noticed this. Please assume good faith.

I certainly do not vandalize. I revert vandalism whenever/whereever I see it. - File:Ottawa flag.png nath a nrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 01:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editing the homosexuality comment

"Others, such as the United States, purge them from the force in the belief that they are a threat"

"Others, such as the United States, purge them from the force in the belief that they are demonstrating their homosexual tendencies."

How is that "vandalism" it is more specific and direct. How is this nonsense, ESkog? More specifically, why don't we specify how the military views homosexuals as a threat, a threat to what, exactly? And why do we have to compare the military's policy of "Don't ask, don't tell" (which doesn't allow open homosexuals to participate in the military) to the Knights Templar which were killed? How is this negative attitude similar to the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy which actually allows homosexuals to participate in the military as long as they don't openly demonstrate their sexual orientation?

71.9.11.95 04:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Anonymous[reply]

Creed

From the looks of your "contribution" page you spend on average ~2 minutes deciding to revert someone's edits. I certainly spent more time researching and making my contribution to the creed article than you did deciding to revert it. I know I'm a bit of a newbie here, and maybe it's not my place to give you advice on what you do on wikipedia, but try to realize that reverting people contributions without discussion (and if you read the discussion you would have realized that people had requested info on the 311 vs creed stuff) does not help anything. It only creates hard feelings and revert wars. Thanks for wasting my time :( Rm999 04:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

With converting Big XII and Big Twelve--> Big 12 per the conference's style guide. Johntex\^talk 17:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:201.215.232.5 (Adana revert war)

Hi, please see WP:AN3#User:201.215.232.5, apparently a new incarnation of the anon you blocked last night. Thanks! Lukas ^(T.|@) 17:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monobook

Would you mind having some more tabs added to your monobook[8]?Voice-of-All^T|@|ESP 18:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might not want to copy right now since I am making some changes (and broke it in a few revisions). Also the GML script gives "bad token" all the time for the last hours so I removed an anti-hack measure that makes it work again.Voice-of-All^T|@|ESP 21:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, copy my monobook now. Everything works, though if I can get the anti-XSS hacker fix back in I'll let you know. The error message will still show, but the script will go on and omplete the revert as normal.Voice-of-All^T|@|ESP 21:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you used the bv template on a talk page. Just click the "w" tab to do that automagically :).Voice-of-All^T|@|ESP 21:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just added a "final warning"(fw) tab to our js scripts.Voice-of-All^T|@|ESP 21:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DontDateHimGirl

Thanks for the AFD help, though I was about to conclude that I'd misread WP:WEB w/ regard to this one. — Lomn Talk 21:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zmmz

I was asked to keep you updated on the behavior of User:Zmmz. Lately he has been vandalizing my talk page and personal user page about issues that have nothing to do with him. See evidence here and here.

He has also been following my contributions and removing all of them indiscriminantly without much explanation. Some examples were recorded here. Most of my edits have been fully discussed in the talk pages and were implemented upon consensus. User:Zmmz has not even been participating in the talks.

Could you tell me what I'm supposed to be doing about all these? I left a message on his talk page asking for explanations, but the message was removed without any response. Aucaman^Talk 00:45, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:Aucaman keeps erasing the word Aryan from all the articles that contain it, like Khuzestan, and Iran, even though Voice-of-All^T|@|ESP warned him that he has a 1rr limit. I am not going to the Persian people article, but I reverted it back to a prior version that was reverted by Aucaman; that is as compromise I inserted the word Aryan tribes, next to the word used by User:Aucaman, which was Iranians. Columbia Encyclopedia describes such people the exact same way. [9] If he is using me as an excuse for initiating edit wars, then I’m going concentrate on the Rfc page against User:Aucaman for now and leave his edit wars to others, but just to let you know, he too is spamming talk pages and asking admins for help; this is an example of this. Thank youZmmz 01:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Zmmz

I have been staying away from the Persian people article (I only made one simple edit today, which by the way was reverted without much explanation). The problem is that User:Zmmz has been following me and reverting my edits at various places without saying anything in the talk pages. Sometimes I work hard with other users and come up with a compromise version, but he just jumps in there and reverts the compromise without saying anything in the talk. He did it a few hours ago and it was documented here and discussed here. Aucaman^Talk 02:55, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I won`t spam this admin`s talk page any longer, since he or she already complained against me in an Rfc, but User:Aucaman erasing and objecting to the word Aryan is like someone erasing the word Yankee in an aricle about Northern Americans. I actuall thought User:Aucaman was commiting some sort of sneaky vandalism, or at best pushing a POV. Because it is getting to be too disruptive, from now on our only choice in to involve the Arbitration Committee.Zmmz 03:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JS spelling

Ohh..I see[10]. You correct yours shortly before I edited yours and copied it to mine to do the same edit. I was wondering why you said it was spelled wrong. Thanks for the fix :).Voice-of-All^T|@|ESP 03:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aucaman

In here: [11]

Let me translate to you what he wrote:

"payande IRAN! hala boro kashketo besab. mordeparast. bisavade aghaboftade. koorosh kabiretam be joz ye bisavade adamkosh bish nabood. hadaghal oon ozresh movajahe. vali to....??? mozdooram babate."

Lasting Iran! now go get out of here. Dead-lover. Illiterate retard. Your great Cyrus was nothing but an illiterate murderer. Atleast he can get away with that, but you? (some swear word) your father.

I don't know what racism means to you, but as an Iranian I was deeply offended by this comment. --MysticRum 19:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now I would like you to think..is this person with such views fit enough to dispute on Iranian articles? I hope you have the right answer for me. --MysticRum 19:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am also deeply offended. Please also read User_talk:Aucaman#Cyrus_and_Persians --Kash 11:15, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to KU basketball

All my changes have been legitimate.

Jerry Colangelo was recruited to KU with Wilt's class. He transferred after his freshman year. I suggest you consult the Hall of Fame site.

William Johnson played basketball at KU for Doc Allen and is in the Naismith Hall of fame. I suggest you consult the HoF site.

John McLendon is a KU grad who wasn't allowed to play because of segregation. As he told me c. 1984, Allen considered him "one of my boys". I suggest you consult the HoF site.

Ernest Quigley played for Naismith at KU and is in the Hof as a referee. I suggest you consult the HoF site. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.244.150.13 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Template:Titled-click

What's with {{bv}}? Note that nothing was actually displayed on any featured article with the "vandalism". It was a DIV element set to display none and with fake elements that would only be visible when viewing the page's source code. It brought quick attention to the issue, as to get it protected before a malicious vandal saw it and put an offensive image on every featured article. I don't know how this would have gotten unprotected in the first place. I have seen many vandals attempt to vandalize every template on a page, and it usually takes awhile for people to figure out what is vandalized and revert the changes. 140.254.57.48 22:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Waya_sahoni - 3RR and accusations of stalking and vandalism

I have apparently been accused of unsubstantiated vandalism against some unamed pages by User:Waya_sahoni at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Waya_sahoni#3RR_heads-up.

I would like to offer you some background on the broad scope of the issue, here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Talks_to_birds#You_are_named_in_an_ARBCOM_Proceeding_regarding_Jeffrey_Vernon_Merkey_Article

Further relevant discussion can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Joe_Byrd_(Cherokee_Chief)#Resolution_of_Copyvio_issues, and particularly here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Joe_Byrd_(Cherokee_Chief)#.22Classic_Merkey.22.

It is interesting to note that "Waya sahoni" responded to your statement about his repeated reverts with charges of "stalking" and "vandalism" agaist a number of people, but as yet he has not substantiated anything to any of these people, other than to say "I'm afraid you have to do your own research. My assessment of your conduct stands. Waya sahoni 03:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)" to everyone who has asked for specifics.

Of course, he did not respond to your point in any substantive way.

Thanks... -- talks_to_birds 03:44, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zmmz

You might want to take a look at this. Aucaman^Talk 02:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about KU's loss

Eric: Sorry about KU losing. Its the first time KU has lost back to back postseason openers. GL next year.

Sorry for the Vandalism

I am new to wikipedia and I was simply editing it (not realising that would effect the whole system) to print of as a document easy to read from I thought I was simply editing the way it was going to print not the page it self so therefore I am very sorry and shall use the Sandbox instead! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.74.29.30 (talk • contribs)

Messages

Sorry about writing directly on to your page. Wasn't sure how to do amessage instead. Guess I found it.

Feel free to block me from editing Wikipedia. As I told you, this is a public computer. I've got my own Wiki account on my own computer that I use to make serious, factual, objective changes. But right now I feel like goofing off. I'm on a public library computer that I may not use again, and if you block me you're really not stopping me. See, I could hop to the empty computer on my left, or the one two spots to my right, or I see four across the room. You won't be blocking me, but you will be blocking future people who choose to use this computer.

I distort, you decide. :-p —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.170.89.58 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Kansas bands

There's a very sparse article over at List of bands from Kansas that I believe you could add something to. Not being from the area, it's hard to tell what's notable; I added The Anniversary because I happen to own their CD. Hopefully you know of some more Kansas bands. Rock chalk! Isopropyl 22:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR at Persian Jews

Thanks for checking it out, but I have a question, When you re-add most of the sections back but change certain passages so that the the other editor is more likely to accept it, is that still consdiered reverting?- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 01:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AOL related blocks

ESkog -- please be aware that AOL users are blocked by the auto blocker and by block requests from admins based on shared IP numbers. I am a long term user, with a history of many of these inadvertant blocks. Please see my user file User:WBardwin/AOL Block Collection. Information on this block is found below. I would appreciate a prompt release. Thank you. WBardwin 07:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by ESkog for the following reason (see our blocking policy): "repeat vandal, personal attacks" Your IP address is 207.200.116.200.

I've unblocked WBardwin. In the future, please make sure that blocks on AOL ranges are naver longer than a few hours, and normally 15 minutes. After that, you won't be blocking the vandal anyway, just whoever gets the recycled IP. Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 08:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instantnood

You blocked Instantnood for the move war on Template:HK. The real answer to stop that move war which ArbCom intended is to ban him from editing the page using the template on Wikipedia:Probation. SchmuckyTheCat 15:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plasma cosmology reverts

I count only three. I know it is nitpicking, but I like to keep my record clean. Please retract the insinuation that I violated 3RR. Thanks, --ScienceApologist 18:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Parker Angel

I'm not vandalizing anything. Thats a real picture of the person mentioned. —This unsigned comment was added by Dinogayman (talk • contribs) .

Personal attacks against Hetar.

Hello friend, I apologise for the personal attacks but I was heavily provoked. I tried to discuss it with Hetar on his talk page but he deleted my well informed and well thought out comments without debate, which enraged me. Personal attacks won't happen again, but I feel slighted when someone deletes work I have done on an entry, dismisses it as "nonsense" then doesn't even attempt to have any kind of debate with me on the subject. —This unsigned comment was added by 84.9.45.254 (talk • contribs) .

Hello again. After calmly and consideratly attempting to start a debate with Hetar on the issue, he deleted my post with no response. What should I do now? I've had a look at the resolving disputes page but I don't find a clear answer on what to do in this kind of situation. I don't really want to esclalate it, but find a solution which suits both of us. Thanks in advance for your help.

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page!

It's very much appreciated. AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

#wikipedia-en-admins

Hi ESkog - that's done. If you have problems getting in message me, Talrias, Shanel, JamesF, notafish, Interiot, jacoplane, or mindspillage - one or the other of us will be awake :) -- sannse (talk) 07:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A quick request

This may seem like a small thing, but you deleted Gyrodactylus salaris a while back. Could you also delete the redirect Gyrodactylus Salaris please? --Stemonitis 13:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response! --Stemonitis 14:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]