User talk:Melhongro
September 2014
[edit]Melhongro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Accept reason:
That's fine, but consider ...
Here are a few key questions:
- Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
- Do you understand conflict of interest?
- Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?
You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
--
Hello Daniel,
I totally understand the points you mentioned above. I just wanted to update the current informations with the most recent ones. I do not want to make propaganda or anything else like that, which does not comply with Wikipedia Policy.
As you can see, I just added more accurate information into the already existing texts, and the updated game list / revenue.
If you want to discuss more about my writing, feel free to tell me.
Many thanks.
--
Hello Daniel,
I have no news about my username changing/unblocking. I'd like to know if you understood that I'm not making a business directory of the company ; I solely updated the out of date informations with the last one. The modifications I've made have been changed because of a suspicion of vandalism. I totally understand the guidelines of Wikipedia but I don't understand why my contribution is questionable, except my unsername.
Regards, Sébastien.
@Daniel Case: I'm alright with this so long as he understands WP:COI. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, Sebastien, do you? (You can read this if you need a less dense version of the policy) Daniel Case (talk) 17:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I’m really sorry about the mistakes I made. I should have avoid the issue we’re currently discussing by asking to another contributor to update the Wikipedia Page in order to avoid COI issues. I didn’t want to get involved into this problem. I won’t make the same mistake again. I deeply apologize for this.
As I said before, I solely wanted to update the page, without being partial or non-neutral. You can see by yourself that the modifications I made are neutrals, impartial and can easily be verified by everyone. I would never bring troubles to anyone with my contributions. I understand that Wikipedia must remain neutral by avoiding any COI conflicts. I didn’t wanted to violate this critical point. I won’t edit myself these pages in the future and will follow the advices. I’m totally open to discussion and I don’t want you to have a bad image of me. I will follow the guidelines more carefully.
How do you want to proceed? Do you want to withdraw any modifications I made and let the community chose to do so or not? Or will you let my contribution online, considering that it’s as neutral as possible? Plus, I agree to change my username in order to comply with the Wikipedia Policy and avoid any COI suspicions in the future.
Regards, Sébastien.
- If we unblock you and you agree to abide by the COI policy, are you interested in editing anything else? Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Daniel, As long as I can bring my contribution to any other article, I will. And, of course, I will abide by the COI policy and won't make the same mistake again. Sébastien.
Hello @Daniel Case: do you have any news about my unblocking and my username change? Many Thanks. FocusHome (talk) 08:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)