User talk:General Ization/Archive 21
This is an archive of past discussions with User:General Ization. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Administrators' newsletter – December 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
- EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
- Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂
Interface administrator changes
- An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
- Following a proposal, the edit filter mailing list has been opened up to users with the Edit Filter Helper right.
- Wikimedia projects can set a default block length for users via MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry. A new page, MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry-ip, allows the setting of a different default block length for IP editors. Neither is currently used. (T219126)
- Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 2 December 2018 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive
.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
GOCE December 2019 Newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors December 2019 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December 2019 GOCE newsletter, an update of Guild happenings since the September edition. Our Annual Report should be ready in late January. Election time: Nominations for the election of a new tranche of Guild coordinators to serve for the first half of 2020 will be open from 1 to 15 December. Voting will then take place and the election will close on 31 December at 23:59 UTC. Positions for Guild coordinators, who perform the important behind-the-scenes tasks that keep our project running smoothly, are open to all Wikipedians in good standing. We welcome self-nominations so please consider nominating yourself if you've ever thought about helping out; it's your Guild and it doesn't run itself! September Drive: Of the thirty-two editors who signed up, twenty-three editors copy edited at least one article; they completed 39 requests and removed 138 articles from the backlog, bringing the backlog to a low of 519 articles. October Blitz: This event ran from 13 to 19 October, with themes of science, technology and transport articles tagged for copy edit, and Requests. Sixteen editors helped remove 29 articles from the backlog and completed 23 requests. November Drive: Of the twenty-eight editors who signed up for this event, twenty editors completed at least one copy edit; they completed 29 requests and removed 133 articles from the backlog. Our December Blitz will run from 15 to 21 December. Sign up now! Progress report: From September to November 2019, GOCE copy editors processed 154 requests. Over the same period, the backlog of articles tagged for copy editing was reduced by 41% to an all-time low of 479 articles. Request archiving: The archiving of completed requests has now been automated. Thanks to Zhuyifei1999 and Bobbychan193, YiFeiBot is now archiving the Requests page. Archiving occurs around 24 hours after a user's signature and one of the templates {{Done}}, {{Withdrawn}} or {{Declined}} are placed below the request. The bot uses the Guild's standard "purpose codes" to determine the way it should archive each request so it's important to use the correct codes and templates. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators; Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Changes to Italian American page
Just curious why you reverted my edits on this page back to the previous erroneous information.
jpd6711 9 Dec 2019
Jpd6711 (talk) 02:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Jpd6711: Christopher Columbus is generally accepted to have been Italian. See that article for numerous sources that confirm this. Your edit to Italian Americans, in which you changed "was Italian" to "is thought by some to be Italian" with regard to Columbus, apparently reflects your opinion, but we are not interested in your opinion here, unless it is shared by reliable sources cited with the content. You cited none for your change to the article's content, so it was reverted. See WP:BURDEN. Also see Original research and Neutral point of view. General Ization Talk 03:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the appropriate handling of the latest Edit War on Jesus. I was actually in-progress on doing the same but you beat me to it! Jtrevor99 (talk) 02:34, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Qu'est ce qui est assez pertinent pour être poster sur Wikipedia ?
Bonjour, je me demandais qu'est ce qui détermine une personne assez " pertinente" pour avoir une page dédiée sur Wikipedia ? AbigaelleNiep (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- See WP:BIO. Also, this is the English Wikipedia; please compose all talk page messages in English. General Ization Talk 00:26, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Just letting you know that this accident doesn't meet the guidelines for List of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft. Namely the size of the aircraft involved....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:11, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Cheers
Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well G. MarnetteD|Talk 11:53, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas!
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
圣诞节快乐!~ メリークリスマス!~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Hello, General Ization! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:22, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}
Season's Greetings
Hello General Ization: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 07:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
Changes to Impeachment InThe United States
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
My edits were legitimate and were made to reflect accuracy in the applied section. The column header says "Result." The removed information was not a result, but a further description of the current status. The information used to replace the pre-existing information reflected a more accurate description of the current status of this particular event. Wayngrove (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Wayngrove: Once again, as already explained on your Talk page: You do not get to remove entire paragraphs of reliably-sourced content without discussion on the appropriate Talk page and unless you can establish consensus for the removal. I'm not sure what you think is contradictory between the Results column of the table and the content you were removing, but it is not. And even if it was, you may not remove large blocks of content once restored by another editor without discussion. General Ization Talk 20:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- I suggest you read the article at the link I provided on your Talk page. The impeachment of Donald Trump is complete, regardless of when the articles are delivered and whether or not he is convicted in the Senate and removed from office. No less than the Republicans' own expert witness spells that out at the link. General Ization Talk 20:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
I read the article but it still does not support your reasoning for undoing and reaffirming the existing information. Yes, the impeachment is complete, but there is no result without a trial by the senate. Therefore, there should be no information or "Pending" information listed in the Results column.Wayngrove (talk) 20:31, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not going to discuss this with you in two places at once. See your Talk page. General Ization Talk 20:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
false accusations from you
You falsely accused me of making disruptive edits to the John K Bush page and if you have any honor or integrity you should apologize. Your claim is entirely unsubstantiated and motivated by your politics. The edits I made were clarifications supported by the source material of the previous editor. The previous editor made vague claims like (paraphrased)"Bush compared abortion to slavery". My edit was that Bush compared Roe v. Wade to Dred Scott, which is the specific comparison that bush made. You political ideologues are going to have to come to grips with the reality that your opposition to truth just poisons wikipedia and destroys your own credibility. Wikipedia should not be an ideological echo chamber, but right now that's all it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wokeandbroke (talk • contribs) 00:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Requesting article changed back to its correct name
Looking at his talk page, you’ve previously warned the user JorgeLaArdilla (talk) about changing article names. He has changed Mohamed Salah to Mo Salah, with their reasoning “no-one calls him Mohamed Salah”, which is nonsense. I’d revert if I could, but I’m not accustomed to how this process works. Would be grateful for your assistance. Barton Dave (talk) 00:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Please submit your request at Wikipedia:Requested moves. The page has been protected so that only admins can move it. General Ization Talk 04:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 2019 Annual Report
Guild of Copy Editors 2019 Annual Report
Our 2019 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your Guild coordinators:
Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
Rollback misclick
Sorry, I accidentally rollbacked one of your AIV reports. I'm trying to undo it, but it might be too late. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2019 Dayton Shooting
Hi Gen - I have worked on the above article and 2019 El Paso shooting. The edit I made today reverted the political pov added on January 27 by Cement4802 and returned the article to it's neutral, consensus version. I did leave an edit summary.IP75 (talk) 02:18, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
GOCE March newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2020 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2019. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2020, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election results: There was little changeover in the roster of Guild Coordinators, with Miniapolis stepping down with distinction as a coordinator emeritus while Jonesey95 returned as lead coordinator. The next election is scheduled for June 2020 and all Wikipedians in good standing may participate. January Drive: Thanks to everyone for the splendid work, completing 215 copy edits including 56 articles from the Requests page and 116 backlog articles from the target months of June to August 2019. At the conclusion of the drive there was a record low of 323 articles in the copy editing backlog. Of the 27 editors who signed up for the drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. February Blitz: Of the 15 editors who signed up for this one-week blitz, 13 completed at least one copy edit. A total of 32 articles were copy edited, evenly split between the twin goals of requests and the oldest articles from the copy-editing backlog. Full results are here. March Drive: Currently underway, this event is targeting requests and backlog articles from September to November 2019. As of 18 March, the backlog stands at a record low of 253 articles and is expected to drop further as the drive progresses. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Help set a new record and sign up now! Progress report: As of 18 March, GOCE copyeditors have completed 161 requests in 2020 and there was a net reduction of 385 articles from the copy-editing backlog – a 60% decrease from the beginning of the year. Well done and thank you everyone! Election reminder: It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Reaching out
Hi, I've recently moved to Columbus and am significantly working on this topic. Is this somewhere you live or lived? I've run into your name on some photos and article history pages. You can email me at ematwikipedia@gmail.com, let me know if you'd be interested in helping or someday attending a local meetup. Best, ɱ (talk) 22:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Ɱ: Yes, I live in Columbus. I'll be happy to help, and/or to meet (albeit virtually for a time), though I'm a little busy with COVID-19-related RL at the moment. You can email me using the link at the top of the page. Welcome to central Ohio! General Ization Talk 00:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, actually the link is in the upper-right corner of my user page (not here). General Ization Talk 00:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Alright, sent you an email. ɱ (talk) 02:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. Actually, I pinged you on another service. Thought that might be an easier venue for a chat than this or email. General Ization Talk 02:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Alright, sent you an email. ɱ (talk) 02:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
User:BFDIBebble socks
Also please check User:Dr. D.S. White and User:Flith buster. Thanks. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Lard Almighty: I do not have access to the checkuser tools. Please submit a new SPI for these users. General Ization Talk 14:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have done but not with this user as the master. I'll alter the SPI. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Sock tags
Sock tags should only be placed by administrators or SPI clerks. Please do not place sock tags, especially on the user pages of unblocked users. It is disruptive. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- @AntiCompositeNumber: The {{sockpuppet}} template without the confirmed parameter can be placed by anyone, as it states that an account is suspected of sockpuppetry. The placement of the templates with the confirmed parameter was based on checkuser confirmation and the fact that the accounts were in fact already blocked indef, as the template states. There is nothing at Template:Sockpuppet/doc that suggests that the placement of an accurate template by a seasoned user is disruptive. If you think this should be addressed as a matter of policy, please arrange for that documentation to be updated or for some other guidance to be offered. While I have no beef with you, I don't think your personal opinion is sufficient for you to state that any action on my part is disruptive. General Ization Talk 19:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
- CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
- Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
GOCE June newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors June 2020 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2020. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below. All times and dates stated are in UTC. Current events
Election time: Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 00:01 on 16 June. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, or you know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. June Blitz: This blitz begins at 00:01 on 14 June and ends at 23:59 on 20 June, with themes of articles tagged for copyedit in May 2020 and requests. Drive and blitz reports
March Drive: Self-isolation from coronavirus may have played a hand in making this one of our most successful backlog elimination drives. The copy-editing backlog was reduced from 477 to a record low of 118 articles, a 75% reduction. The last four months of 2019 were cleared, reducing the backlog to three months. Fifty requests were also completed, and the total word count of copy-edited articles was 759,945. Of the 29 editors who signed up, 22 completed at least one copy edit. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April Blitz: This blitz ran from 12 to 18 April with a theme of Indian military history. Of the 18 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed a total of 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. May Drive: This event marked the 10th anniversary of the GOCE's copy-editing drives, and set a goal of diminishing the backlog to just one month of articles, as close to zero articles as possible. We achieved the goal of eliminating all articles that had been tagged prior to the start of the drive, for the first time in our history! Of the 51 editors who signed up, 43 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news
Progress report: as of 2 June, GOCE participants had processed 328 requests since 1 January, which puts us on pace to exceed any previous year's number of requests. As of the end of the May drive, the backlog stood at just 156 articles, all tagged in May 2020. Outreach: To mark the 10th anniversary of our first Backlog Elimination Drive, The Signpost contributor and GOCE participant Puddleglum2.0 interviewed project coordinators and copy-editors for the journal's April WikiProject Report. The Drive and the current Election of Coordinators have also been covered in The Signpost's May News and Notes page. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC).
Invitation to RedWarn
Hello, General Ization! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.
RedWarn is currently in use by over 75 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 02:47, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
Precious anniversary
Three years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, @Gerda Arendt: But I've been active on Wikipedia since January 2006! General Ization Talk 02:17, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, but I'm slow, it took me until three years ago to notice how precious you are ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Elle a
Please remove the comment as it was posted by accident.
Then why is a — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevieb2685 (talk • contribs) 03:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)