User talk:GimliDotNet/Archives/2015/February

Edits on C. J. Henderson Page

Hi Gimlidotnet,

I just saw that you removed the full bibliography link I posted on the C. J. Henderson page. Could you let me know why, as the Bibliographical source I linked had much more information than was on the page? Was it in the wrong place, or was there another issue? Thanks!

Stevenaarmstrongsf (talk) 21:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't look like a reliable source. It's essentially a 3rd party wiki that doesn't really suit a link. GimliDotNet (talk) 22:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Gimlidotnet,

I hear you. I read the source page. I could create a pretty decent bibliography from sources like Worldcat, LOC, etc. Would that fit the guidelines? The one on his page is woefully inadequate and is missing a ton of his work, including books that he is very well known for. BTW: are you now monitoring any posts I make? It's a free internet (and we intend to keep it that way!), and I don't mind, just wondering. Stevenaarmstrongsf (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

No, I am not monitoring your edits. When you added mis-information to the Inkling article I looked at your contributions to see if it [[looked like you where not here to edit constructively. You are slightly incorrect, it is not a free internet - deliberately making disruptive edits here will result in editing privileges being removed. If you really are interested in asking questions about which sources are reliable (wiki's never are) I would raise it at the reliable sources notice board, those people are the real experts when it comes to what does and does not constitute a good source. GimliDotNet (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Gotcha. I'm sorry if we got off on the wrong foot. And I certainly don't want to be disruptive! I'll check out the RSN. Thanks. Stevenaarmstrongsf (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)