User talk:Hamarberg

Hello, I'm Twiceuponatime. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lerwick have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Twiceuponatime (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful edits

Hi Hamarberg, I'm Griceylipper. I've reverted some recent edits you have made to both the Shetland and Northern Isles articles, as they were removing uncontroversial mentions of Scotland, and making bold claims about Shetland's inclusion in the country of Scotland. Any such bold claims must have reliable sources to back them up. In addition to this, many templates which make the article display properly were broken in doing so. I appreciate Wikipedia editing is not the easiest to get the hang of to begin with, however if you do want to continue to make constructive and well-sourced edits, I recommend you try editing in your own sandbox first to get the hang of the results of changing templates. I do appreciate your additions to the Baltasound article, however you didn't include any source - do you know of a source for the name of Baltasound, or a source for the alternative spelling? All Wikipedia content must have some form of written source to prevent anyone making up false claims and propagating them through Wikipedia. If you are able to let me know of a source I will gladly help you include this as a source in the article. Otherwise I will have to revert this too. Griceylipper (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Shetland, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shetland have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 14:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yell, Shetland. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your bold edits have been reverted. Please discuss on the article talk page. BeReasonabl (talk) 22:22, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moar

Please note that disambiguation pages like Moar are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Detail about the name Moar is not really appropriate for a disambiguation page, which is simply for navigation and shouldn't contain material that isn't already included in an article. If you have reliable sources, you could add information to an existing article or start an article on the name. Leschnei (talk) 15:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]