User talk:HarabianNights

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks)

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Azayas4reel (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Indefinitely blocked - sockpuppet of User:Azayas4reel

Anthony -

You're blocked. Your first account was blocked for disruptive editing and attacking people. Within a week you created this new account.

When we block you we do not want you editing Wikipedia.

This new account is also blocked indefinitely.

If you want to return to editing, you need to acknowledge that editing in an abusive manner, including self promotion and harrassing people, is not acceptable behavior on Wikipedia. You never properly apologized for or agreed not to continue attacks such as those on Mr. Lugo that got you blocked the first time.

Your article on yourself, Anthony Zayas, has no independent reliable sources other than imdb.com and tv.com, and your creating it is in violation of our policy on conflict of interest in editing.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:31, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarabianNights (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unfortunately, I do not know what you are talking about. I am not the user that you think I am. I know Anthony Zayas and am his friend. You are accusing me of disruptive editing in an abusive manner, as well as self promotion and harrassing people. That is incorrect allegations. If I were guilty of the assumptions that you are making then yes I would apologize. But since I am not I WILL NOT apologize for something I didn't do Mr. GeorgeWilliamherbert. Your findings are baseless. I never ever contributed to disruptive editing or to harrass a "Mr. Lugo." Who is this Mr. Lugo? I have never heard of him in my life. If you do not want any editing from this ip address then that is one thing. But to accuse me of violating wikipedia's guidelines or what you call a "sock puppet" for user Azayas4reel is ridiculous. My name is Hassan Taufik and I used Azayas4reel's computer to edit. Again, if you do not want me to edit under the name HarabianNights or from this IP address who cares. You seriously seriously need to get A LIFE and stop accusing a new user of such events. No wonder the image of wikipedia is going down. Who uses wikipedia for reliable information anyway. If you would like I could display external references about how the global community feels about wikipedia and it's supposed factual data. I can provide references too. Maybe that will bring you back to reality. Editing on wikipedia is not my end all be all dream in life. If I cannot edit here I will edit under a new scream name and a different IP address to make the appropriate adjustments that need to be made. No biggie. But before you accuse make sure you are correct. That is all I need to say to you and Please GET A LIFE! Happy Halloween!(HarabianNights (talk) 3:28 pm, Today (UTC−4))

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but tossing around accusations and personal attacks will not get you unblocked. TN X Man 19:38, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

HarabianNights (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

98.109.38.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

[[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]: Obvious sockpuppet of indef blocked [[User:Azayas4reel]]

Blocking administrator: Georgewilliamherbert (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Unfortunately, I do not know what you are talking about. I am not the user that you think I am. I know Anthony Zayas and am his friend. You are accusing me of disruptive editing in an abusive manner, as well as self promotion and harrassing people. That is incorrect information. If I were guilty of the assumptions that you are making then yes I would apologize. But since I am not I WILL NOT apologize for something I didn't do Mr. GeorgeWilliamherbert. Your findings are baseless. If you do not want any editing from this ip address then that is one thing. But to accuse me of violating wikipedia's guidelines is ridiculous. My name is Hassan Taufik and I used Azayas4reel's computer to edit. (HarabianNights (talk) 03:34, 31 October 2009 (UTC)) (HarabianNights (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarabianNights (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wow, that was pretty quick. thanks for responding and once again GET A LIFE!! Throwing around accusations is what you and the wikipedia community have done to me. I have been blocked because of your company's allegations suggestion that I am a sock puppet and am contributing in disruptive editing when in fact I contributed to three articles that may be helpful to the wikipedia community and it's users. Once again if I cannot edit here I will edit under a New Screen Name and use a new IP address to continue to edit and make appropriate adjustments that are not considered disruptive editing and harrassment. Please GET A LIFE! Again, Happy Halloween! (HarabianNights (talk) 19:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:59, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarabianNights (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

YOu stated that these are the reasons of the block. - *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or - *the block is no longer necessary because you - **understand what you have been blocked for, - **will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and - **will make useful contributions instead. First of all you have claimed that I am an obivous sock puppet of Azayas4reel which is incorrect. Second, This block is not necessary because I am not damaging or disrupting wikipedia. Third, I understand what you have blocked me for and I will not and have never caused damage or disruption and have always made useful contributions. So therefore this block is a form of harrassment to me HarabianNights. You are trying to punish the IP address and in doing so you are harrassing me. Once again GET A LIFE! I will create a new account and continue with my editing from another IP address. Finally, Please remember to do get a life and Happy Halloween!! (HarabianNights (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, but I have a reading disability that makes it difficult for me to understand messages that are expressed rudely. It's a terrible difficulty in my time as a Wikipedia administrator. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:21, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block setting updated to prevent editor from editing this talk page; this is to prevent further abuse of the unblock template and violations of WP:NPA. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:24, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Anthony Zayas

I have nominated Anthony Zayas, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Zayas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TN X Man 20:23, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tainotalisman8 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:33, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]