User talk:Irk

Thanks

Thanks for your help with AFI's 10 Top 10 page, but there are too many people editing... so I will let you take control...

cheers, Hooty88888 (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Smith

If you create an article about a person, it might be considerate to check if any articles referring to a different person links to the page, and if required unlink the page. Thanks, Andjam 10:54, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure?

I was going to put some sort of "Cleanup" tag on Omarosa Manigault, but I didn't want to do so since I wasn't sure whether or not the article needs to be cleaned-up neither I want to admit that it's NPOV. Did you went over the article carefully before putting an NPOV tag on the article? Just curious. Thanx. — Mark Kim (Reply/Start Talk) 00:28, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Film criticism

Hello. I was just wondering why you put an NPOV tag on Film criticism without explaining why on the talk page or in your edit summary. When I read the article and edited it, it seemed fine to me. Could you give some reasons why you don't think it is NPOV on the article's talk page so as myself and other editors may be able to improve the article? Thanks. Gershwinrb 02:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted a response to your message on Talk:Film criticism. In the future, you should leave a little note about why you put up an NPOV tag (or any tag for that matter) on the article's Talk Page so other editors will be able to understand why you think the article needs to be improved. Happy editing! Gershwinrb 05:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:June2006playboy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:June2006playboy.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Playboy

Since I changed out Dorothy Stratten's name for Ursula Andress, would you say that you're okay with the factual accuracy of the section of the Playboy article now? Dismas|^(talk) 19:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Athlete pictorials are fairly low in number but then that's also partially due to the fact that there aren't that many well known female athletes (when compared to men). And then weed out those that Playboy wouldn't be interested in based on their looks and you have an even lower number of available candidates. I also have no problem with changing the list from Sports to Supermodels or Bond girls (hmmm.... Bond girls... Wonder how many of those have posed...) since I didn't create the lists in the first place, I'm not really all that concerned with the specific categories. I do think the lists are a good addition to the article though since the celebrities are often what gets the magazine sold because guys want to see the celebs in the nude. Maybe once we're done staining our bookcase I'll go through the magazines to find some sports figures. I could go through the list here but then where's the fun in just looking at a list of names. :-) I'll go remove the tag then... Dismas|^(talk) 20:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Dismas|^(talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Removed Dahm triplets image?

You removed the Playboy cover from the article Nicole, Erica and Jaclyn Dahm with the enlightening comment "it's NSFW". WDTM? :-). If you're worried about fair use rationale, you'll notice the entire reason the Dahm triplets are notable is because of their Playboy appearances. That seems like a very important reason to have their only Playboy cover, rather a high point. I added the fair use rationale to the Image:Dahm Playboy AU cover.jpg page and restored the image, hope that's all right. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 12:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - NSFW = Not Safe For Work. I think this particular cover image is OK - nothing frontal. Also see the extensive discussions linked to from Wikipedia: Pornography - there are many more explicit things in the Wikipedia. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 20:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After further discussion, it's been replaced with a safer image. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last Name

I noticed you changed Eva to Pigford on Eva Pigford's page. Why is it that in every person page they always use the last name but only use the first name once?? Lil Flip246 16:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 15:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Poseidon (film), but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 15:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add any more articles to that category unless the article itself already explicitly supports the category or unless you provide a reliable citation. Thanks. --Yamla 16:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited edits by others to Christine Smith

There have been some uncited edits by anonymous IPs to the article about Christine Smith (the adult model). You might be interested in checking if the claims are accurate or not. Thanks, 11:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by andjam (talk • contribs)

Comments?

Just curious if you saw my question at the bottom of Talk:List of people in Playboy 2000-present. Dismas|^(talk) 17:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Reid

If you have anything or suggestions to add that would make it more wikified, go ahead and put in your contributions in the article. Robert Moore 01:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Ohyeahmormons, I have replied to a few of your comments and posted a message on Talk:Garden State (film). I have moved the Themes section from the article to the talk, as I feel its inappropriate to have a non-neutral, unreferenced section in the article, though Themes can be incorporated if done right. I reckon we can take down the clean up sign, as overall I think the article is quite good, the plot needs to be decreased and cast expanded, but its a quality article, and those issues would just improve the quality, and I think at the moment, its not worthy of a clean up tag just for those issues, as its pretty well written, has some good references and is pretty well structured and comprehensive. Anway, what do yo think, could we take it down? Please share your thoughts on the GS talk page, and thanks for taking an interest in making the article better! Thanks. Sunrise50 08:43, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ohyeahmormons, its down now. Thankyou :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunrise50 (talk • contribs)

Paris Hilton

I really hope that you can improve this article. But if you do, expect to be reverted and a few gallons of abuse. Wallie 15:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why the strange name?

Why did you choose "Ohyeahmormons" as your wiki-name? What's the significance? Das Baz 20:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inside joke between me and my friend. Why? Ohyeahmormons 22:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why indeed? That's the question. Das Baz 18:03, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um...what? Ohyeahmormons 18:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New template

Just thought you might like to know about a new template I created. It's at {{Playmate}}. It basically adds the text "Jane Doe at Playboy.com" to the external links section of Playmate's articles where their name is linked to their Playmate stats at the site. August through November of this year don't work because Playboy has yet to update their site with the Playmate's bio's but the rest work just fine. With your past work on Playboy related pages, I thought you might like to know about it. Dismas|^(talk) 11:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you very much, I think that's actually rather useful. :) Ohyeahmormons 14:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Birth date and age template

I was wondering if you might add your thoughts to the talk page atTemplate talk:Infobox Playboy Playmate in regards to the birth date and age template. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 03:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done and done. :) Ohyeahmormons 19:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Dismas|^(talk) 21:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

For general info, see WP:SIG. For what I have used in mine, go to your preferences, under "User profile" put [[User:Ohyeahmormons|Ohyeahmormons]]|[[User talk:Ohyeahmormons|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] into the signature box and then make sure the "Raw signature" box is checked. You can play around with different things like color and such as well. You'll find guidelines about what's acceptable and what isn't on the SIG page. Hope this helps, Dismas|^(talk) 21:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Big Love actors

I thought about the category that you started, Big Love actors, last night and have left an additional comment at the CFD page about it. Just thought I'd draw your attention to it. (see here) Dismas|^(talk) 12:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Karen McDougal

I think you want to submit this for Good Article? I think the references are pretty much done and you can submit after adding the 1997 Playmate template. 65.213.44.9 18:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Barbwireposter.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Barbwireposter.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jaden Smith

You recently removed sourced information from the article Jaden Smith. While you find this information as WP:POV, since it comes from a reliable source (USA Today, in this case), and is from an article title Oscar Pursuit for Jaden Smith would be natural, it is providing a prospective on the actors abilities from a credible publication. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 03:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed "sourced information" that you didn't correctly source. Without saying "Whoever says blah blah blah", it simply said "He's an actor who is better than whatever the article said." Irk _(talk) 03:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The Real World: San Francisco

Hi. It seems we have a possible edit war on the The Real World: San Francisco article. If you could respond to the post I made on its talk page, it would be appreciated. Nightscream Nightscream 04:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jenniferwalcottnsscover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jenniferwalcottnsscover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sundra Oakley

An article that you created, Sundra Oakley, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sundra Oakley Thank you. SkierRMH 05:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Playboy_June_1996.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Playboy_June_1996.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 00:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work

Just wanted to drop you a note and say that I like the changes to the "List of people in Playboy..." lists that you've done. The blue especially. Dismas|^(talk) 19:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, good sir. :) Irk _{Come in for a drink!} 19:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons WikiProject membership update

The Simpsons WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #~~~~, in order to renew or cancel your membership.

If you do not comply with any of the choices, at the end of 1 month after this message was posted, your membership will be canceled and your name removed from the list. If you wish to regain your membership, just sign in again!

The The Simpsons WikiProject team – 09:50, 11 December 2024 UTC [refresh]

Speedy keeping on the AFDs

It's best to tell you here:

Your reasoning isn't in the speedy keep deadlines.
Even if it is being recorded, there is no guarentee of release (e.g. Chinese Democracy has been in the studio ten years, but that's already notable). (WP:ATA#CRYSTAL)
For some, there is not even a valid source to prove that they're being recorded.
Finally, yes, there are other articles, over half of the "untitled album" articles are at AFD (see also WP:WAX)

Thanks, Will ^(talk) 17:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Playboy_June_1991.jpg

I have tagged Image:Playboy_June_1991.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 05:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Surnames

I have started a discussion at Category talk:Surnames about Category:Surnames which I hope will be able to address the issues in common to the surnames category tree, without implicating issues particular to any one group of surnames. I'm posting this notice to all participants of the 11/11 CFD. --Lquilter (talk) 20:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funeral for a Fiend

I saw you disagreed with the removal of some content. Could you please look at the content that was removed that I added and give me your two cents? I think that episode spoofs would be a good addition to The Simpsons as a lot of people like to look for them. I would appreciate your input --Madscientist013 (talk) 14:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CoCo?

I don't have my Feb. copy of Playboy just yet, so when you put in the 2000-2008 Playboy list that "CoCo" was going to be in the March issue, which CoCo did you mean? Dismas|^(talk) 03:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Kennedy Center Honors recipients

Good job!

I like the sortable table on Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 6). The scores as they are were hard to work through, and this makes it much easier to find the scores. Leobold1 (talk) 00:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Belladonna awards and nominations

If you wanted List of Belladonna awards and nominations to be merged, you did not need to take it to AfD. AfD is not for articles to be merged. I have speedy closed the deletion discussion, since deletion and merging are unrelated, and I will place merge tags on the articles in question. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did the same with List of Sandra Romain awards and nominations. Again, remember that if you want an article merged, Articles for Deletion is not the place to go. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Next month's playmate source

Quite often, this web site is used as a source of info for who the next Playboy Playmate will be. Since anons use this site as a source when they update the next month's info, I wanted to know where the site was getting its info. So, I went to the U of Chicago web site and asked who's site it was (student, faculty, etc.) and if they could help me find out the ultimate source. I got the following reply:

My advance information about upcoming Playmates usually comes from two sources: the Next Month page in the current issue of PLAYBOY; and the online Playboy TV schedule:
http://www.playboyenterprises.com/pbtv_schedule/index.cfm
On that page is a link to the current month's schedule, and from that page there is a link to Next Month. If you then pull up the full month's listing, search the page for "World of Playboy". Starting mid-month, the name of the following month's Playmate will appear.
I think those sources are very reliable, but still there are occasional late changes and what is scheduled may not happen in reality.

Just thought you might want to know, in case you ever wonder or if someone else wants to know how reliable the source is. Dismas|^(talk) 21:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New AFD, old topic

You might want to see/weigh in on this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Evenson Dismas|^(talk) 04:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolás Gutiérrez

It appears as if you tried to move Nicolás Gutiérrez (california) to Nicolás Gutiérrez using copy/paste. In the future, please only move articles using the move tab at the top of the page. Using copy/paste to move an article separates content from the history of the article, and loses the attribution required under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 00:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

You keep beating me to editing AFI's 10 Top 10! :p Morhange (talk) 02:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Thirst

Hello. I have improved this article considerably, and I would be grateful if you would reconsider your views on its deletion. Thanks.--Michig (talk) 12:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Why does it matter to you if you if theres two tables or not?--Ydnar12 (talk) 02:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Love Money

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on I Love Money. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dina (talk) 02:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I ♥ Money!!!!!!

I definately do love money but, I shared my thoughts about the chart on the talk page. Sean9500 (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of I Know What Boys Like

I have nominated I Know What Boys Like, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Know What Boys Like. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? –Dream out loud (talk) 14:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SYTYCD 4

Hey i see that u edited Wade's piece from this week, Cat said before the break, "A Wade Robson Jazz routine" just to let u know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.60.39 (talk) 01:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template talk:Infobox Playboy Playmate

Please see Template talk:Infobox Playboy Playmate#Sources. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 16:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: Gabon {{inuse-section}}

It's been over an hour since you edited the section and I suspect that you have finished, so I have removed your {{inuse-section}} and made some copy editing changes. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: Gabon, Matty's votes striked through?

I am on the west coast, so I have yet to see tonight's episode. Why are Matty's two votes are canceled? Was he given the hidden immunity idol? if so, that should be mentioned on the article. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 02:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright on I Love Money (Season 2)

Thank you for pointing out a potential copyright violation on I Love Money (Season 2). Upon reading the WP: fairuse policy on text, it appears you're only concern is the length of the quotes, as attribution was given? I agree that the current situation is not ideal, in that the amount of material being quoted is a bit excessive in comparison to the length of the article and the length of the source. It would be helpful to have a clear interpretation of the fair use policy, or else almost all quotations on WP would have to be removed. Is it 50%, 20%, 10%, 0% that constitutes fair use? You can reply here or we can move this to the talk page for I Love Money (Season 2). I was impressed that there was actual attribution of the quotes. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 01:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Since you are interested in Pomona College you might want to check out this AfD of a professor's bio: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Sontag. Borock (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Replied on my talk page, in case you're interested. I'll carry on the discussion there if more is warranted. CycloneGU (talk) 05:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What happened?

Somebody beat you to updating Survivor: Samoa this week! =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I know what you mean. This season is a bit boring. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:10, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 10)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 10). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 10). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor Samoa

As a big survivor fan I'm really impressed top see that the lady underdog beat the Russel the villian. –BuickCentury Driver 03:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it. I'm pleased with the outcome as well. IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 04:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Irk! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Athena Lundberg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Qiana Chase - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Reno 911!

Template:Reno 911! has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sandra Nilsson

I have nominated Sandra Nilsson, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Nilsson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 00:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello

I would like to invite you to help me edit torchpedia-survivor.wikia.com. survivor.wikia was so messed up, so i created a new one. Your help will be very much appreciated. thank you :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.55.26.239 (talk) 08:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hef (disambiguation)

The article Hef (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

disambigation page with only one entry

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Purple backpack89 06:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Natalie White

The article Natalie White has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nearly all of this articles contents can be found in the article Survivor: Samoa, and subject is not notable enough per WP:ONEEVENT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Untitledmind⁷² (let's talk + contribs) 13:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sandra Nilsson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandra Nilsson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Nilsson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 19:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. When you recently edited Saturday Night Live (season 22), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page You Were Meant For Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. When you recently edited So You Think You Can Dance Canada (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cha-cha-cha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. When you recently edited So You Think You Can Dance (U.S. season 9), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let's Get Loud (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss february 1990 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Miss february 1990. Since you had some involvement with the Miss february 1990 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Evan Kasprzak

The article Evan Kasprzak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Certainly fails ANYBIO. Majority of sources available refer to not winning a reality show BLP1E. No indication of anything that would reach NCREATIVE or NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 00:59, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I Know What Boys Like

Proposed deletion of I Know What Boys Like

The article I Know What Boys Like has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

AfD occurred when both pages were redirects. Eleven years later, the film page is still a redirect with no incoming article links. The song now is an article and should be moved to this unambiguous title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination for merging of Template:PlayboyPlaymateTimeHeader

Template:PlayboyPlaymateTimeHeader has been nominated for merging with Template:Playboy Playmates by year. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PlayboyPlaymateTimeHeader

Template:PlayboyPlaymateTimeHeader has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Earl Cole for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earl Cole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl Cole until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

George Ho (talk) 07:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of J. T. Thomas (Survivor contestant) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. T. Thomas (Survivor contestant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. T. Thomas (Survivor contestant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

George Ho (talk) 04:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]