User talk:Javier.tb202

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 🌀Hurricane Covid🌀 _(contribs) 16:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Andreya Triana, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Ashley yoursmile! 19:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Andreya Triana. Ashley yoursmile! 19:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Andreya Triana shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ashley yoursmile! 19:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Javier.tb202 reported by User:Ashleyyoursmile (Result: ). Thank you. Ashley yoursmile! 20:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Javier.tb202 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, I believe I've created an edit war and caused disruptive editing whilst trying to update 'Andreya Triana's' Wikipedia page, as a result my account was blocked, I apologise as this was unintended on my part, it is the first wikipedia page I have attempted to edit, and in the process caused a few problems as I wasn't aware of the full process before publishing my work. As I had produced a large body of work without being able to save it, I thought the best option was to try and publish what I had, then continue to cite my work afterwards (in fear of losing what i had), I now know that this isn't the case, nor the best option. Im still unsure of the requirements I need to meet in able to publish my work whilst following the wikipedia guidelines, but if there is any advice or direction that could be provided to me, id be very grateful as I want to produce updated work on this page, using the proper means set in place by Wikipedia Javier.tb202 (talk) 18:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What "work"? You deleted sources, you deleted the infobox, and you inserted your own blatantly promotional, unsourced text, as well as copyright violations. When you were reverted, multiple times, with explanations in the edit summaries and warnings on your talk page, you edit warred over your changes. Clearly you weren't worried about losing your work, because you understood that your edits were preserved in the page history. It seems quite obvious that your account only exists to promote the subject of that article. Are you being paid? ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 01:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]