User talk:Jom995

January 2016

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Friday the 13th: A New Beginning has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 16:47, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Starship Troopers (film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summaries

I see that you're editing a lot of horror film plot summaries. Sometimes they do need work, but you should look at WP:FILMPLOT and WP:WAF before you contribute to more of them. Your additions are adding a lot of unnecessary detail, and sometimes they consist of quotations from characters. I don't think there's any specific rule against this, but I generally don't think plot summaries should have quotations. We're describing the plot, not giving a rundown on quotable dialog. Wikiquote is a better place to put quotations. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm IagoQnsi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to George P. Wilbur has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit made the sentence grammatically incorrect, and it also needs a source. IagoQnsi (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Starship Troopers (film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Stop adding unsourced information. And stop it with the misleading edit comments. Don't call a major addition a typo. Sjö (talk) 20:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mislabelling edits

Please note that mislabelling edits can be considered disruptive editing on Wikipedia as it implies you are doing something when you are in fact doing something else. For instance you keep labelling edits as "fixed typo" or sometimes as "fixed typo, Added links" when in fact you are performing non-typo related edits and aren't just adding links. If you continue to mislabel your edits on Wikipedia you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 02:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you.Canterbury Tail talk 11:43, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 19:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for continuing to use misleading and canned edit summaries despite warnings as in this edit. Canterbury Tail talk 19:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]