User talk:Josephjames.me

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

1, 2

How make biography

? Mishra ram patel (talk) 11:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mishra ram patel: I don't understand. JosephJames 14:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dulquer Salmaan

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Dulquer Salmaan has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheran (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rajadhi Raja. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Congratulations for your success and hard-work in creating the first ever GA for a Malayalam actor (Dulquer Salmaan). Keep going. Charles Turing (talk) 18:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As for GAs, it would be the best if there was at least one GA in every decade of Malayalam cinema, meaning the 30s has one film that is a GA, the 40s has one and so on. That has already happened with Tamil. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: That will be really tough. But I can try if Charles Turing and you are with me! — JosephJames 16:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Josephjames.me. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RIP Charles Turing and Inside the Valley

Both have been blocked on sockpuppetry charges. Now is there anyone (apart from you) left to defend Malayalam film-related articles? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Oh my god! Why Turing? I hope he'll be back somehow. I don't know anybody else who has contributed majorly to Malayalam film-related GAs. This is awful! — JosephJames 14:45, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both have been indefinitely blocked. AniceMathew, JO Bieson, Kichappan, Turing and Inside the Valley... how long will this list go? I thought Turing and Inside the Valley were honest and policy-abiding editors, added by the fact that the latter knew sockpuppetry was illegal by catching numerous socks. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I'm really confused. I don't know if I can carry on doing work on Malayalam film-related articles without the support of anyone. It won't be easy for sure. I hope you will help :D — JosephJames 13:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't quit. There may not be many die-hard GA/FA seeking editors on Malayalam film-related articles, but I can assist you in c/e and proofreading (I would watch Malayalam films if I got them on-demand in HD with subtitles). Kailash29792 (talk) 14:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: No. I won't quit. But it's really tough to keep on like this. If you want subtitles, torrent releases are almost the only option to see'em on demand. Else, buy or rent DVDs. — JosephJames 12:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Train-the-Trainer 2017: Invitation to participate

Hello Josephjames.me,
It gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2017 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 20-22 February 2017.

What is TTT?
Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program. The program attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT have been conducted in 2013, 2015 and 2016.

Who should join?

Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project is eligible to apply.
An editor must have 500+ edits.
Anyone who have already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, can not apply.

Please see more about this program and apply to participate or encourage the deserving candidates from your community to do so: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2017

The last date of filling the form is 26 January. If you have any question, please leave your message here.
Regards. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2014 Malayalam film 'Gangster' poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2014 Malayalam film 'Gangster' poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Josephjames.me. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Singam 3 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Singam 3 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TNM Jawad

Hi, I am unconvinced on the notability of this article. Although I probably won't nominate it deletion, it is quite likely someone else will. If there's any more sources available I suggest adding them, remember Indian language newspapers are acceptable as well as English languages ones. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 07:59, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Frayae: Hey, I could only find these sources as of now. He will be giving a TED talk in the near future as per his facebook page. I'll try and add more sources as and when I find it. Thanks! — JosephJames 08:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I just thought it best to give you a heads up. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:05, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Frayae: Hey, thanks to you, I searched once again and added a bit more material. Will that do any help? — JosephJames 08:32, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that really does. Awards are good for showing notability, and an extra reference is good too. "Outstanding Achievement in Young" seems like a odd name for an award though. Is that translation official? Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Frayae: Yup. Strange name for an award, I agree :D — JosephJames 08:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to "Outstanding Achievement in Young" category. That's better, right? — JosephJames 08:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Frayae:So, uh, could you, uhh, remove that notability warning? _/\_ No pressure :D — JosephJames 09:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean to the award is that in English I would think "young" is descriptive word and not a statement on it's own. I think "Youth Outstanding Achievement Award" would make more sense, if you follow my logic. And yes I will remove the tag. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Frayae:I get you but that is what is written in the article. A rough translation of the relevant passage would go like this, "The last year, in Dubai, he received an award from the multimillionaire and ITL Group chairman Ram Buxani. In an event where around 20 multimillionaire entrepreneurs participated, Jawad received the achievement in the Outstanding Achievement in Young category". I know, what a mess! Also, thanks a lot man. Cheers! — JosephJames 09:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's supposed to be the "Young Entrepreneurs" category? Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:44, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Frayae:Should I edit it like that? I will edit it like that. — JosephJames 09:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably would make more sense to edit it like that. Good idea. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Frayae: Thanks for everything mate. You're the sweetest :D — JosephJames 09:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (TNM Jawad) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating TNM Jawad, Josephjames.me!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A non-promotional bio of a probably notable person. Well done!

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:05, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: Thanks a lot man. Truly means so much. Cheers! — JosephJames 12:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Josephjames.me. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Josephjames.me/Rathish Ambat

@Frayae:@Kailash29792: Hey guys! Could you take a look at the draft and see if it's fit enough to be an article? It's surely a stub but hopefully passes the notability test. Also, take a look at this if you can. I want to be more active on Wiki from now on. Hope you'll respond quickly. Cheers! — JosephJames 12:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Frayae is blocked, so she can't help. About Rathish Ambat, try adding more sections and find more sources using this. Kamala seems good to go per WP:GNG (though you could create and expand a production section), I don't know why they're stopping it. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: What happened to Frayae? She was such a kind soul. I don't know what more to add on Rathish Ambat tbh. There's no information on his early life. Also, no one really "stopped" Kamala per se. They just haven't reviewed it yet. Could you review it? Anyway, thanks for the feedback, mate. — JosephJames 13:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: Inviting you too. I just want to get this over with. Sigh.

@Kailash29792: Busy-ah nanbaa? ;D — JosephJames 16:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Do you know someone who could pass the Kamala draft? It seems you're busy with other works. Please do reply. — JosephJames 09:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Josephjames.me, behold. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Okay, now I'll apologize to you for the incessant pinging and leave you on your way :P Much appreciated, bud. — JosephJames 09:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No issues Joseph. You weren't bothering me at all. In fact, I'm always happy to help... at least when I know I can. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Can we do something about the Rathish Ambat one? As I told earlier, there's no information on his early life. Though the article is definitely a stub, I believe that he does pass the notability test. Your thoughts? — JosephJames 10:16, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph, you answered your own question. Since he has made only one feature film so far, and his second one has just been announced, he still doesn't pass WP:PERSON as he has only received attention for his few works. Why not wait till there is at least one in-depth interview with him? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. A bit annoyed that this will remain in the draftspace. Just when you finish one... Sigh. Will have to wait for a newspaper to publish that in-depth interview I guess. Thanks for all the inputs, again. — JosephJames 10:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Goodwill Entertainments

@Kailash29792: Hey Kailash! Could you take a look at this one? Probably a stub, but to me, the subject definitely seems worthy to be an article. — JosephJames 16:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You could add more about their history and it may be more worthy. --Kailash29792 (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: How about now? Though, I suddenly feel the 'Lucifer being currently the highest-grossing Malayalam film ever' quote doesn't really belong in the aricle. What do you think? Is the article otherwise alright? — JosephJames 16:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Removed that part. What do you think about the draft? If it runs okay by you, a promotion to an article would be great :D — JosephJames 17:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Heya! I have submitted the draft for review. If you aren't too busy... — JosephJames 05:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@StraussInTheHouse: Hey! Inviting you too! — JosephJames 06:30, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Yaar, kahaan ho? :P Also off-topic, did you see Mamangam? I feel its worth a theater watch though it didn't really match upto my expectations. Just saying, I'm all sorts of bored here, hehee. — JosephJames 17:29, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's good you've expanded it further. But is that the best you can do for now? A suggestion though to give the article more weight: create a history section and transfer all the refs there to comply with WP:LEADCITE. Let the lead contain fewer details. And to answer your other question, I have not seen it since I don't know Malayalam and I doubt it may have been released with subs. --Kailash29792 (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792:

Done How does it look now?

And yeah, Mamangam has released with subs. There is also a dubbed version, but yeah, don't go for that :D — JosephJames 05:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Josephjames.me/Dilshad

@Kailash29792: Hey Kailash! Since you have become my go-to guy for converting drafts into articles, could you also please take a look at this one? I had earlier made this article which was passed by Frayae who sadly isn't here anymore. I believe the Dilshad one matches that one's "quality". Cheers! — JosephJames 16:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Hey. I have submitted the draft for review. If you are free, please take a look. — JosephJames 07:16, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I guess I'll have to ping again to gain your attention, huh? :D — JosephJames 12:35, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: I'm so sorry. I hadn't seen that you were blocked. I hope it will be reviewed soon and that you can come back soon. I didn't set an email address simply because I don't have an account. I use my father's account for all the "activations". It's just not worth the effort to me. Anyway, so sorry again. — JosephJames 14:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ReaderofthePack: Could you help me out? I know I'm calling you out of the blue, but please just try and read the draft and if you see that it's good enough, hopefully, pass it. Thanks! — JosephJames 14:49, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This should hopefully provide you some context. — JosephJames 14:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little worried that the coverage is all fairly recent. The arguments brought up by Largoplazo in this regard seem to still be valid in my opinion. It's of course still possible for you to wait out a review and see if someone else differs in their opinion. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 01:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ReaderofthePack: I had worked on it after hearing the arguments brought up by Largoplazo. Also, he himself did comment that "It's definitely better, nice", right? The coverage being recent might just be this person getting recognized late? Is any of that convincing enough? I don't wanna sound authoritative and that's why all my arguments end with a question mark. :D — JosephJames 05:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dilshad (entrepreneur) (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dilshad (entrepreneur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dilshad (entrepreneur), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Josephjames.me! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Singam 3 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Singam 3 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Josephjames.me! You created a thread called Draft:Dilshad (entrepreneur) at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Suresh Poduval

@Kailash29792: Hey Kailash! I believe your block has been removed. (Congrats for that by the way!) Could you please review the draft? I believe it has been developed sufficiently. — JosephJames 05:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung: @Jo-Jo Eumerus: @Anthony Bradbury: As people who have already reviewed (and rightly removed) the article, could you take a look at it now? — JosephJames 05:08, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats Joseph. You revamped the article and I brought it to the mainspace. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayyappan Sreekumar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ayyappan Sreekumar, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iyobinte Pusthakam 2014 Malayalam film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iyobinte Pusthakam 2014 Malayalam film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dilshad (entrepreneur)

Hello, Josephjames.me. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dilshad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ayyappan Sreekumar.jpeg

The file File:Ayyappan Sreekumar.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The media might be an orphan and have no links to any other pages

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravishingstar (talk) 11:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vaanku

Greetings,

Thanks for your article addition Vaanku, now I have updated the same for plot and critical reception. While we have included refs from Malayalam news sources too but on side of critical reception print media sources seem to fall short of expectation. So I do have a request for you, if you can brows through and include notable points any review and panel discussion in Malayalam TV news, if possible.

Second is Malayalam Muslim perspective or discussion among orthodox conservative quarters about the movie Vaanku too seem to be missing. Even though any modern one would not agree with conservative perspective as encyclopedia it is always better to include all sides of the perspectives if available.

Last but not least we can hope both the movie Vankuu and the drama Kithaab may come in Malayalam feminist discourse in near future so if you come across any further feminist discussion on the topic please try to include and update the same in the article whenever possible.

Thanks again and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 06:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bookku! Thank you for your addition to the article. However I am very busy with personal matters and work, so I cannot tend to Wikipedia for awhile. I hope you understand :) — JosephJames 06:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sirajudheen KP for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sirajudheen KP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirajudheen KP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sirajudheen KP for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sirajudheen KP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirajudheen KP (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jupitus Smart 07:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Baburaj Malayalam Actor.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Baburaj Malayalam Actor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 22:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Memories (Upcoming film)

The article Memories (Upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to draftspace until release and then notability can be established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Santhosh Damodharan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santhosh Damodharan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. In addition there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI issue. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not move the article back to mainspace yourself.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Salalah Mobiles - poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Salalah Mobiles - poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Memories (upcoming film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Memories (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memories (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Memories Tamil film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Memories Tamil film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:46, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oruthee film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oruthee film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oruthee

Hello Josephjames.me,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Oruthee for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oruthee film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oruthee film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chattambi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chattambi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Owlf 📪 11:38, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Owlf: Hi Owlf. I do not understand how the sources I added are not independent and reliable? Could you please explain? Thank you! — JosephJames 14:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes unreleased movies hardly meet notability criteria in enwiki so i suggest you to wait untill it will be released or you can add some more independent reliable sources till than and can edit your article but i saw that you already submitted your draft, someone will review your page soon. Owlf 📪 14:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Owlf: Thank you for replying Owlf! I submitted the draft so that we can get a second opinion probably. I will try to better the article till then. Meanwhile, could you tell me how I can prove the film's notability? Thank you! — JosephJames 15:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chattambi film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chattambi film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chattambi (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onmyway22 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Non-released or future films need to meet WP:NFF otherwise submit after the film is released.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chattambi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chattambi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onmyway22 talk 15:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TNM Jawad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TNM Jawad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNM Jawad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KH-1 (talk) 05:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Problem with Malayalam films

Can you do some cleanup? There are no sources that reports reliable box office numbers of Malayalam films, yet articles such as List of Malayalam films of 2022, List of highest-grossing Malayalam films etc. and the films are bloated with citations of promotional figures published by producers, which even sites like TOI cites, not to mention Twitter pages and blogs created by fans. Another problem is circular references copying Wikipedia that Wikipedians use to cite. There is nobody to cleanup those mess, per WP:PRIMARYSOURCES and WP:ICTFFAQ. Previously, Cyphoidbomb was there, now he is inactive. 117.230.86.141 (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi anon! This has come to my notice as well but I am not very active on Wiki these days. Even then, I mostly focus on creating articles rather than editing previous ones. Hope you understand! — JosephJames 03:34, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Memories (upcoming film)

Hello, Josephjames.me. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Memories (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chattambi

Hello, Josephjames.me. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chattambi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Memories (upcoming film)

Hello, Josephjames.me. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Memories".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chattambi

Hello, Josephjames.me. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chattambi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goodwill Entertainments for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goodwill Entertainments, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodwill Entertainments (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Dulquer Salmaan

Dulquer Salmaan has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]