User talk:Komain72

Please do not continue to re-add Beaver Bank to the Lower Sackville article. It is not particularly notable, and should not be mentioned. Additionally, please do not attempt to advertise Beaver Bank with glowing mentions in the article; this violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. ♠P M C♠ 20:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find very many Google hits for Beaver Bank that weren't simple address listing, so I concluded it wasn't notable. Then I looked up the other neighbourhoods, and found little for them as well. So I've simply removed the entire neighourhoods section as non-notable. ♠P M C♠ 19:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Beaver Bank Monarch Drive Elementary. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Oli Filth 01:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Beaver Bank Monarch Drive Elementary, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oli Filth 01:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Beaver Bank Monarch Drive Elementary. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oli Filth 01:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Beaver Bank Monarch Drive Elementary

A tag has been placed on Beaver Bank Monarch Drive Elementary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SamBC 02:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beaver Bank Monarch Drive Elementary

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Beaver Bank Monarch Drive Elementary, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. DES ^(talk) 05:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which article?

Which article is that? I am not a mind reader nor do I have a photographic memory. Postcard Cathy 16:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, you are very welcome! Can you categorise it please, btw? And do something to improve it such as adding notable alumni, Blue Ribbon School award type things - anything that might help keep the article so mr. grumpy editor doesn't get his way! :) Postcard Cathy 16:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

A week or two ago I prod'd an article that basically said John Jones is a pro football player in SDFkJFLDJ Town. Well, to me that is not notable. A notable person - in this case an athlete - has honors, awards, is team MVP, etc. If that was true for John, it wasn't listed. The guy got really po'd cause I did it while I wasn't signed in. So he literally said "What right do you as an anonymous user have to prod my article?" I told him if he wrote a better article I wouldn't have had to prod it and as long as Wiki allows anon users to prod articles, that is where I have the right to do it. So, I signed in, and against the rules reproded the article. I asked him if that was better. He told me if I had done in it the first place, he never would have said what he did. At the end, I just told him he was pissed at something whether it was that he was pissed his article got prod'd, something else, or both but don't get angry at me because of it. If it was because his article was prod'd, I told him not to waste his energy getting mad at me and instead look at the reasons I prod'd it in the first place and then improve the article. IIRC, he left it as is and the article was deleted. Such BS if you ask me. Postcard Cathy 16:45, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Juan-satellite2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Juan-satellite2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Pictou Barn Fire.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pictou Barn Fire.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Mc.Donalds twisted sign.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mc.Donalds twisted sign.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions, such as you did to Hurricane Katrina. This is a simple mistake to make and by now should have been corrected. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talkpages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Tiddly Tom 18:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Juan (2003)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Hurricane Juan (2003), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Oli Filth 18:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving this from page to page. If you want to remove the tag, then just edit the page. However, I will then nominate it for deletion (see Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion), as there is already an article on this subject. Oli Filth 21:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Juan... The Halifax Disaster

Juan... The Halifax Disaster, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Juan... The Halifax Disaster satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan... The Halifax Disaster and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Juan... The Halifax Disaster during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Oli Filth 21:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Hurricane Juan... A Disaster, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oli Filth 21:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bbsign.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bbsign.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i will ask if i have any questions. Thanks. Komain72 (talk) 20:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bbsign.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bbsign.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Demetrius Joyette

A tag has been placed on Demetrius Joyette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lordjeff06 (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Demetrius Joyette. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 21:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you for the information. Komain72 (talk) 00:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization of headings

The Wikipedia style for capitalizing headings is to use "sentence case" instead of "title case", e.g.,

Important things to know about this subject

not:

Important Things to Know About This Subject

This may be unfamiliar to many editors who believe that or have been taught that "title case is the right way to capitalize headings". It isn't the "right way", it is one style. Wikipedia has, for better or worse, chosen to follow a different style, i.e., capitalize the heading the same way you would capitalize any sentence:

capitalize the first word,
capitalize any proper nouns (people, places, organizations), and
begin all other words with lower case letters.

See WP:MSH for more information. Ground Zero | t 03:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Kyle 2008 5 day track.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Kyle 2008 5 day track.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gallery tlb 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Gallery tlb 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Danny (2009)

There is no need for the article yet and it is a copy of a season article. Thank you. Darren 23 ^{My Edits} 01:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Harold T Barrett Junior High.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Harold T Barrett Junior High.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haifax Disasters listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Haifax Disasters. Since you had some involvement with the Haifax Disasters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 20:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bblake.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Beaver Bank Sign.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:53, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Komain72. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Komain72. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Demetrius Joyette for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Demetrius Joyette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demetrius Joyette until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Komain72. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]