User talk:Legendaryloser

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Byke Matheran.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! - Happysailor ^(Talk) 20:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Rahul Gandhi. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:44, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Rahul Gandhi. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Rahul Gandhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. We don't add nicknames given to people by their opponents. Please stop adding this. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also please read this: Talk:Rahul_Gandhi#Pappu --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Legendaryloser reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:18, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Wifione. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Rahul Gandhi, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please read WP:WELLKNOWN. If you wish to introduce the inference that Rahul Gandhi is called by some title on social media, kindly provide multiple high-quality references to support this exact conjecture. Please read WP:Verifiability and WP:Original Research to understand (a) what is meant by "high quality references" and (b) why you cannot infer on your own that a person is called by some name on social media until there are multiple high quality references that mention that he is called by that name on social media.

I hope you understand that this article is a BLP of a well known person. We really don't care what the social media thinks of the person. We care what high quality references can be provided to support your statements. Blogs, primary sources, cannot do. So please be careful. Write back to me for additional support. Wifione ^Message 10:47, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep going the way you're going and it's likely you'll wind up being blocked permanently. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:12, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Rahul Gandhi. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Byke Matheran concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Byke Matheran, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Byke Matheran

Hello Legendaryloser. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The Byke Matheran".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Byke Matheran}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]