User talk:Lerintruka

September 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to John Todora has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: John Todora was changed by Lerintruka (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858988 on 2017-09-30T08:09:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FiberGuide moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FiberGuide, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Undisclosed paid editing in violation of Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:51, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lerintruka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am extremely sorry and I was not aware of this policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Paid-contribution_disclosure. I didn't know I have to mention in detail if I am editing for someone in exchange for money. From onwards I will always mention my employer details if I make any paid contributions. I am requesting to unblock me and oblige. Thank you. Lerintruka (talk) 11:01, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:26, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin This account is a checkuser-confirmed sock of Madeline18B. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yunshui, there must be some mistakes. I do not know this account: Madeline18B. Never even encountered with this editor before. Can you please recheck my account? Lerintruka (talk) 15:05, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lerintruka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood that I was blocked for Undisclosed paid editing as required by Wikipedia's Terms of Use. I was not aware but now I know the Terms of Use so I promise in future there will be no Undisclosed paid editing by me. I will also abide by https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use/en and I will not make any edits which can cause damage or disruption. I will make useful contributions. I would humbly request to accept my apologies and consider my unblock appeal.

Decline reason:

I think it is possible that you are telling the truth about not being a sock puppet of Madeline18B. However, you are a spammer, even if you're not a sock puppet of that spammer. And, to be frank, we already have enough spammers. We don't need more of them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This doesn't address your violation of WP:SOCK at all. --Yamla (talk) 01:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, I swear I am not WP:SOCK. I don't even know these other editors and I have no clue why and how I am being linked with them. Please, there must be some mistakes, trust me. I also requested the admin who blocked me to check my account. I can promise you this is my only account and I won't be creating any other account to make edits. Lerintruka (talk) 16:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]