User talk:Mabbs001

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raymond Sandover has been accepted

Raymond Sandover, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mabbs001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Anotherclown (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anotherclown

Many thanks for your message. My first contribution will definitely need adding to so thanks again for your help and all the links you sent me!!

Mabbs001 (talk) 01:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mabbs001. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alfred Sandover, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mabbs001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Slough, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 01:51, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zackmann08: Many thanks, I was using a smart phone and the curser was a bit of a nightmare to get in the right location to correct the template. I’ll use my desktop/laptop next time so that templates aren’t corruptedabd and double check on preview. Thanks again. Mabbs001

Denham update

Hi Gareth, noticed you reverted my update regarding Denham. As Denham is a commuter village into London I felt it pertinent to give a mileage from Charing Cross. (As most towns and villages in the Home Counties and commuter belt have a mileage to central London/Charing Cross). Your revert to the previous edit (Uxbridge approx 4 miles) is also factually incorrect. Is there any way that these can be corrected?! Mabbs001 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mabbs001 (talk • contribs) 1:07 pm, 27 November 2018, last Tuesday (3 days ago) (UTC+0)

Hello Mabbs,
So sorry to have missed replying to your request on my Talk regarding Denham, Buckinghamshire.
I have just made this revision to the Lead: ... in the South Bucks district of Buckinghamshire, England, approximately 17 miles (27 km) from central London, 2 miles (3 km) northwest of Uxbridge and just north of junction 1 of the M40 motorway.
Please tell me your understanding of, "1.8 miles (2.9 km) northwest of Uxbridge" as my interpretation is the distance from the original village centre. Your, " lies 16.7 miles (26.9 km) west-north-west of Charing Cross, central London" is far too accurate for a Lead section. Remermber, we are not writing a gazetteer. Cheers! ... Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} 11:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gareth, no worries many thanks. Mabbs001

As Wikipedia septuagenarians, we must keep an eye on each other.

By the way, you do not appear to be "automatically"signing your messages on talk pages.
Just type four tildes (~~~~) when you stop typing and this will automatically insert your username and the date. Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} 11:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, Ha, I agree and thank you. By the way, although I've been a Wikipedia editor for q while I'm still trying to get used to the format and what the different symbols do and mean. I tried for ages to get my signature on my last message but will try the (Mabbs001 (talk) 01:06, 11 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Well it worked, thank you again. :-) (Mabbs001 (talk) 01:08, 11 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

There will be no stopping you now. I'm always glad to help, if I can. Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} 12:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, ha, there certainly won’t now! 😊 (Mabbs001 (talk) 00:33, 12 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you again, I may come to you for more editing advice in future! 😊 (Mabbs001 (talk) 00:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Gwin poeth sbeislyd i chi ...

... gan yr hen Gymro; rwy'n gobeithio eich bod wedi cael gwyliau Nadolig gwych ac rwy'n dymuno 2019 heddychlon i chi!
That is Welsh and translates to:
Spicy hot wine for you from the old Welshman; I hope you have had a great Christmas holiday and I wish you a peaceful 2019!
Thank you for your excellent work on the 'pedia.

Sincerely, Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 12:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, hope you had a good Christmas and have a great 2019. :-) (Mabbs001 (talk) 23:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Two Shires Ambulance Service

Hello, Mabbs001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Two Shires Ambulance Service".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, I understand that it this page has been deleted and the reason why but I was going to submit the draft for for acceptance in to the main page. Is it possible to reinstate it so I can submit it? Many thanks. Mabbs001 (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail reference at Gerrards Cross

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Gerrards Cross. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two Shires Ambulance Service (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Two Shires Ambulance Service and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Two Shires Ambulance Service, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 06:18, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mabbs001! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 06:18, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colne Valley Viaduct

I think you're a bit off on your coords for the viaduct. It is now displayed on SABRE, and if you take the approximate midpoint it's closer to Latitude: 51.5864, Longitude: -0.4924 (link) Thoughts? 10mmsocket (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thank you for getting in touch.

I took the Coords from the government map and then Google maps. If you look at my Coords I’ve put exactly where one of the supports for the bridge is (zoom in on Google maps. I agree that it’s not exactly aligned to what some maps are publishing, such as Open Street or Sabre etc. but I put the Coords on a bridge support from the gov website and Google maps.

Do you think they should be moved?

Kind regards, Mabbs001 (talk) 18:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SABRE is an official map, but t.b.h. I think for the moment until it appears on other maps it's probably fine to leave it where it is. 10mmsocket (talk) 19:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know it is but I’m from Gov map and where Google Maps (satellite version) actually shows the bridge support. As I’ve mentioned, OpenStreet and Sabre are publishing the exact same line that the route will take which differs by approx 30 metres to my map source.

I agree, I think we should wait until it comes up on a map as built.

My Coords are slightly more accurate than the previous entry, which had the viaduct going through central Harefield. :-)

Regards, Mabbs001 (talk) 01:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I drove past the site last week (or at least I was on the M25) and the amount of construction is mental! 10mmsocket (talk) 08:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly is. Unfortunately I live not far from the site, the lorries going to and from the site are complete pain, roads are being ruined with the amount of traffic. I go past it most days/weeks and the mess it’s made from Denham to West Ruislip adjacent to the Chiltern Line is bordering on the insane.

Regards, Mabbs001 (talk) 13:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Reclaim Party

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Reclaim Party, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox timestamps

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 13:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]