User talk:Musides

Sahuarita article

You're doing a great job expanding the Sahuarita article. Keep it up, and we can see it becoming better than an average article! Nyttend 02:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have to confess that I was initially frustrated with the process -- seeing my work so simply undone! But, I'm getting the hang of how this system works, and how communication can go back and forth, and I can see how it works. Thanks for your help. I plan to keep working at it, in fact, this weekend I'm planning to go around town and take some photos. :) It is my family's home now, so I have to make sure it gets to tell its story in Wikipedia! :)

NowCommons: File:Basgen-Sahuarita-townhall.JPG

File:Basgen-Sahuarita-townhall.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Basgen-Sahuarita-townhall.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Basgen-Sahuarita-townhall.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Tui-logo-2011.png

Thanks for uploading File:Tui-logo-2011.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coefficient of relationship visualization

Hi, I didn't explain very well, but I just think that the diagram you added needs some more explanation. You have assumed no pedigree collapse, and I think it is important to say that, and also mention the 50% assumption for crossover. Not too long ago, it was thought that crossover was non-random, and some readers might be coming with that in mind. Also, it seems from what I've observed of edits to wikipedia pages about genetics, that there are some extremely uninformed readers out there who might have no idea that pedigree collapse could make a difference. Best wishes, Nadiatalent (talk) 18:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, adding the assumptions about pedigree collapse and crossover are good suggestions.

Pedigree collapse is a very interesting issue, I think the page Wikipedia has on the subject can do much better. Royalty is an easy example, though the visualization on the King of Spain could be much better. Also, I think it would be ideal to have some real-world data on the more common forms of pedigree collapse vis-a-vis small town family lineage. Further, I would imagine that there should be models out there for the probability of collapse over time, since collapse is obviously inevitable. That being true, I do wonder about the probability of collapse even within 16 generations, which is frankly a long period of time (depending on how one counts of course, but we are in the 400-500 year range). Within that time period, the probability of ancestors living in small rural communities is quite high and thereto, one would think, so too is the probability of collapse.--Musides (talk) 22:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Yes, it would be good to investigate such things with some diagrams. In case you haven't walked into this yet, though, I think I should warn you that there are some related pages such as inbreeding that to some people are politically highly charged. Trying to bring these up to a scholarly standard is likely to be a disappointing endeavour. I hope that you don't invest a lot of effort in this and then find yourself arguing with bizarre individuals about fundamental facts. It can get very weird in wikipedia. Nadiatalent (talk) 22:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning! I was suspecting it could be a challenging subject. :) Wikipedia contributions are sometimes a mixed bag in that sense. I find the subject personally interesting, so I'll see if I can squeeze in some time to research it a bit. Even if it doesn't come to pass at Wikipedia, I can always publish elsewhere. If I'm able to come up with concrete and interesting data, I'm sure there is somewhere it could call home. :) --Musides (talk) 23:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sahuarita town seal.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sahuarita town seal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bay Path logos

Thanks for updating the Bay Path page. Just so you know, you should update the source whenever uploading a new version of an image. The file description page has a spot for it so you can say where you found it. Designate (talk) 21:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. I plan to do more updates over time to help bring the quality of the article up to standard. Full disclosure, I work for the University. I am well aware of the neutrality guidelines, so that should be okay. --Musides (talk) 22:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution for image

Dear Sir,

I would like to use your excellent image of the "Arizona Bark Scorpion" available at http:/upwiki/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/01/Bbasgen-bark-scorpion.jpg/800px-Bbasgen-bark-scorpion.jpg , in an extension-outreach publication related to pests in community environments. This publication is purely for educational purposes and has no commercial interests whatsoever.

However, the suggested attribution format, ""Bbasgen-bark-scorpion". Via Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bbasgen-bark-scorpion.jpg#mediaviewer/File:Bbasgen-bark-scorpion.jpg", is very different from the style I will be following for other pictures in my publication, which will most likely be much shorter and in the format:

"Photo by Abc Defghijk", or "Photo by Abc Defghijk, Lmnopqr.org".

Therefore for the sake of consistency, kindly let me know whether I may cite the images in the above formats, and if so, what name/affiliation should I use.

Thank you! Sincerely, Shaku

Shaku Nair, Ph.D. Assistant in Extension, Community IPM University of Arizona - Maricopa Ag. Center 37860 W. Smith-Enke Road Maricopa, AZ 85138-3010 Cell: (520) 840-9429 Office: (520) 374-6299 nairs@email.arizona.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nair.shaku (talk • contribs) 05:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my delayed response, it has been sometime since I've logged in. You are welcome to use the photo in whatever way works best for you. You can simply attribute the photo to Brian Basgen. --Musides (talk) 20:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Basgen-scorpion-mother.JPG

The file File:Basgen-scorpion-mother.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Musides. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tui-logo-2011.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tui-logo-2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:USS Vermont BB-20 January 3 1913.png

Thanks for uploading File:USS Vermont BB-20 January 3 1913.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]