User talk:Ngfan1

Welcome!

Hello, Ngfan1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Footwarrior (talk) 13:31, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 01:05, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sundown Mountain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sundown Mountain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dennis Brown (talk) 02:25, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited United States presidential election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constitution Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Ngfan1/Frank Fluckiger has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frank Fluckiger, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 05:18, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Frank Fluckiger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sarah (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebekah Kennedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution Party of Tennessee

Hello, Ngfan1, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Constitution Party of Tennessee, appears to be directly copied from http://wpedia.goo.ne.jp/enwiki/Constitution_Party_of_Minnesota. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Constitution Party of Tennessee if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 01:59, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Constitution Party of Delaware (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Clayton

Constitution Party of Kentucky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lexington

Constitution Party of Maryland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rockville

Constitution Party of West Virgina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Daniels

Constitution Party of Wyoming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lovell

Daniel P. Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Republican

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

American Party (1969)

Do you know for sure if the American Party is inactive? 130.64.178.145 (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution Party of Florida

Hello, there is currently a discussion over the notability of this article (and perhaps other similar articles) you created. If you wish to discuss this matter, please do so at the article's talk page. Royal Mate1 02:10, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

American Third Position Party

Hello. Wikipedia's policy is that all information, especially if it is contentious or controversial must be supported by a link to a reliable source. In the information you are trying to add to this article, only the information on the presidential election is actually sourced at all, which is why I and another editor have been removing the rest of it. When another editor reverts your edit, the proper step to take is to discuss it on the article talk page, not to continue to try to undo the revert. (See WP:BRD). When you try to do this you are edit warring, which can lead to your being blocked from editing. Please do not attempt to reinsert the information with a citation from a reliable source. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:17, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you cannot list candidates you ran on another party's ticket without presenting a source that says the candidate was representing the American Third Position. I have removed these two, you can restore them when you have those citations. Also there was no gubernatorial election in West Virgina in 2011. If you were referring to a primary of some sort, you'll need a source to support that as well. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There was an election for governor in West Virginia in 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Virginia_gubernatorial_special_election,_2011. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngfan1 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 20 December 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected. The reference was wrong though - I've fixed it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The course you cited for the presidential results gave 2,703 as the tally, so I reverted your change of it to 2,714. If you have a more official source that supports 2,714 you need to change the reference. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:59, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

THe new source you provided is a blog, and per WP:BLOGS, we don't consider them to be reliable sources. You need to find a reputable news agency of some sort as a source. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 05:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at American Third Position Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You've actually gone past 3RR now. And note that as it says, this is not an entitlement. Dougweller (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 14:27, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 15:55, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Maine House of Representatives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Andrew McLean

Thomas Ravenel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Republican

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Socialist Workers Party (United States) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Edward Shaw

Tom Stevens (politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Libertarian Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Constitution Party of New Jersey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Constitution Party of New Jersey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constitution Party of New Jersey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 16:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frank Fluckiger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Fluckiger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Fluckiger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]