Jump to content

User talk:Ponyo/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15→Archive 20

Congrats

On your appointment. Not really sure what the Audit Subcommittee does, but it sounds pretty heavy. Best, The Interior (Talk) 18:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! You can read all about the exciting world of the Audit Subcommittee here. I realize I owe you an email by the way - it will be forthcoming :) --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 19:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Many congrats Ponyo - A, U, S, C. - what it stands for I don't know, but well done anyway. A good result for all. - Rob. - Youreallycan 03:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Cheers Rob! --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Boyceavenu

why did you delete my user Boyceavenuexfactor talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boyceavenuexfactor (talk • contribs) 20:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

It was deleted because it was being used to promote you/your website, which is against Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Please do not restore it. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Brooke Lyons' birth date (Part 2)

I had to bring up again, but Brooke Lyons' birth year is still believed to be 1980. As it is said on her IMDb profile, which is also linked on her official website. After searching on Google, that is also the only year I could connect her to. Also, I asked her twice through Twitter if the date on her IMDb profile is actually hers, no response, not that I blame her, it is an odd question to ask in general on Twitter, anyway. I'm thinking maybe, just maybe that the full date on IMDb is correct. Yes IMDb is not considered 100% reliable, but is a known fact that actors themselves, edit their own profiles. It is said so many times that "anyone" can edit IMDb like here on Wikipedia, when that is not true at all. IMDb clearly states that "When submitting/correcting a date of birth you *must* include: URLs to public records, printed publications, or official documents to accompany your submission". Birth records websites can only be accessed if you are a already member and/or must pay a fee. No one should obviously go through that trouble just to find a birthdate. Well, just wanted to let you know about by progress on this issue. QuasyBoy 23:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

I certainly admire the effort you're putting in to finding a reliable source! I'm going to sound a bit like a broken record here, but IMDB has been shown time and time again to be unreliable - I have personally responded to angry emails via OTRS from Wikipedia subjects who dispute the accuracy of the information we have in their articles, specifically information that was sourced to IMDB. It is simply not reliable enough to be used with any certainty. There is absolutely no draw back in keeping the date out of the article until it can be confirmed (which is actually what BLP policy dictates we do), her notability and place in Wikipedia is tied to her roles and coverage, not her birthdate. I'm certain the year will eventually be verified in a source meeting WP:RS, and on that day I'll buy you a virtual beer :) --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 00:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
P.S. If you think I'm being overly-cautious, please do feel free to bring it up at WP:BLPN to get additional input. If you do, could you please pop me a note here to let me know? Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 00:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Well thanks, again. It just that besides Wikipedia, IMDb and a few other sites, information like is user-submitted and user-populated, it terribly difficult these days to determine which site is a "reliable source". Hohum, Until next time. QuasyBoy 00:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Max Bernstein musician page

Hi Ponyo -

I have edited this article down a bit to reflect that fact that this is a very not-well known musician with very little relevance other than a hired gig for a major pop act. The prior expansion of the page copied excessive information - nearly every factoid in it, from an obscure published interview, one of the only ever published on this obscure artist. As there are many far more accomplised guitarists with much shorter pages, it doesn't make sense to have information on say, the songwriting process of someone who has sold under 2000 copies of any one particular song, etc. Tacomailman (talk) 22:59, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

If the information is reliably sourced there is no need to remove it. Please bring up your concerns on the talk page to allow other editors' input as opposed to blanking the content. You're not really "editing it down a bit" so much as pulling out all of the content. If you have major concerns regarding Bernstein meeting Wikipedia's guidelines for notability then the appropriate place to discuss it is on the talk page or via AfD. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

My userpages

Hello. Recently 2 of my pages have been deleted due to the fact that I am a 'minor' and should not show my age. However, the pages were removed before the last revision, where I removed my age. Please may I have these restored to the revisions before deletion (User:Tomtomn00 and User:Tomtomn00/userpage1) - also, the history of the page is deleted, so would that be restored? ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 22:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello Tomtom00 - your page was subject to oversight by someone other than myself. Perhaps User talk:MBisanz could provide you with the info you're looking for? --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

André (singer)

Accuracy in Wikipedia is important.

Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is a self-proclaimed republic because the independence is de-facto and not de-jure. The unilateral independence of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is not internationally recognized by the United Nations and also by Armenia and is de-jure part of Azerbaijan (de-facto not under its control and jurisdiction). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.82.38 (talk) 17:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

None of this information is pertinent whatsoever to the André (singer) article. If readers want to know more about the naming intricacies and politics of a region or country they can click on the wikilink provided to learn more, the POV description is unnecessary in this unrelated article. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 18:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Gee...

I link to YouTube, something I've seen others do countless times, and now you're threatening to block me? Get a life, jerk. RMc (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

It really doesn't matter what other people do, you are responsible for your own editing and ensuring you are following Wikipedia policies. When a policy is pointed out to you, especially one as bright-line as our copyright policy, and you choose to ignore it, then it is completely reasonable that your account be blocked to prevent further disruption. It was not a "threat", it was an explanation as to why the link should not be restored, along with a pointer to the relevant policies, and a warning that continued linking to copyright violating material would result in a block. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage newsletter

Hey all!

Thanks to everyone who attended our first office hours session; the logs can be found here, if you missed it, and we should be holding a second one on Thursday, 22 March 2012 at 18:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. I hope to see you all there :).

In the meantime, I have greatly expanded the details available at Wikipedia:New Page Triage: there's a lot more info about precisely what we're planning. If you have ideas, and they aren't listed there, bring them up and I'll pass them on to the developers for consideration in the second sprint. And if you know anyone who might be interested in contributing, send them there too!

Regards, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 00:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ponyo. You have new messages at Drmies's talk page.
Message added 16:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Drmies (talk) 16:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Ponyo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Guillaume2303 (talk) 09:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots

Abhin Galeya edit

Hi ponyo

I have seen that my latest edit in Abhin Galeya has been undone - please let me know what is the promotional material you think I should remove - are reviews and quotes alright to put on - and links to interviews etc? I want to give a more detailed account of this actors career than what is there - please let me know what I can keep in what I have written - thanks for your help Zebbush (talk) 21:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

The majority of what you wrote was blatantly promotional in nature. While the addition of neutrally written material accompanied by a reliable source is welcome, adding reviews, quotes and promotional links is against Wikipedia policy. As I noted on your talk page, if you are at all affiliated with Galeya please review our guidelines with regard to editing with a conflict of interest. It may be better to use the article talk page to suggest changes you would like to see to get feedback prior to making the edits. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

help triage some feedback

Hey guys.

I appreciate this isn't quite what you signed up for, but I figured as people who are already pretty good at evaluating whether material is useful or not useful through Special:NewPages, you might be interested :). Over the last few months we've been developing the new Article Feedback Tool, which features a free text box. it is imperative that we work out in advance what proportion of feedback is useful or not so we can adjust the design accordingly and not overwhelm you with nonsense.

This is being done through the Feedback Evaluation System (FES), a tool that lets editors run through a stream of comments, selecting their value and viability, so we know what type of design should be promoted or avoided. We're about to start a new round of evaluations, beginning with an office hours session tomorrow at 18:00 UTC. If you'd like to help preemptively kill poor feedback, come along to #wikimedia-office and we'll show you how to use the tool. If you can't make it, send me an email at okeyes@wikimedia.org or drop a note on my talkpage, and I'm happy to give you a quick walkthrough in a one-on-one session :).

All the best, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/99.76.216.240

I think there is enough bs in those edits to fill S P Crater. Sad but true, all of the edits will need to be undone. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for cleaning that up already. I was actually trying to figure out when t-shirt cannons were invented of all things. But when I saw "While he enjoyed eating hot dogs like most children, he wanted nothing to do with them after seeing the manner in which they were made" I figured I'd found an unsung vandal.--Milowent • hasspoken 18:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


Do you have a suggestion

Hello P. I am wondering if you have any suggestions for a situation that I've just come across. This new editor Ronlammers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) looks to be someone messing with long time constructive contributor Donlammers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Now this was four days ago and it doesn't seem to have bothered Don much so I don't think there is any action needed right now but I am wondering where the best place to report this is should they resume their activities. WP:UAA? I hope that your spring is progressing nicely and cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 23:11, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I consulted my AGF Fairy Godmother and even she rolled her eyes at the suggestion that this could be anything other than disruption; I have blocked the impersonation account accordingly. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I appreciate you taking the time to look into this and preventing further nonsense. MarnetteD | Talk 00:12, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Anytime MarnetteD. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 00:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

James MaCaffrey

Sorry about that, just sharing the birth date of James McCaffrey because it's not written, and I know when. So since I don't have a Wikipedia account, I'm not familiar with verifying, citing sources or any other. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.203.66.220 (talk) 01:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

I think you'll likely find Wikipedia:Tutorial very helpful if you would like to learn about the various Wikipedia policies and guidelines and how to put them in to practice. If you sign up for an account you will also have access to a watchlist that will allow you to track articles that interest you (additional benefits can be found here). If at any time you become "stuck" or unsure on how to format or edit a page, the editors at the help desk will be able to lend you a hand. Good luck and welcome! Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 14:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit Summary

I am presuming that f/u here stands for "follow up" but when I caught it on my watch list I assumed it meant "Fuck you". May I suggest that you try to avoid this harmless edit summary in case some trigger happy humourless admin misunderstands your intent and blocks you? Cheers Spartaz Humbug! 16:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

f/u is commonly used as an acronym for follow-up, but I could see how some could possibly misconstrue the letters into something less civil. I can't imagine that a trigger happy humourless admin would be able to retain the mop for long if they are going around blocking other admins for a possible variant of a common term, but stranger things have been known to happen here. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Dispute with a user

Hello again Ponyo. I am in this useless edit war with User:LiamNolan15212, over what appears to me as a redundant subsection on the Milan Cheylov article. Not only that but the user is using a TV show Wiki as a source, which is user-submitted. I left messages on his talk page, he deletes them, I have reported him to the noticeboards, I have been ignored. Just look at his edit summaries for the article, his reasons for keeping the sub-section are little... out there: [1] Help me out please. QuasyBoy 17:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Please respond, I could use an administrator's advice. QuasyBoy 17:43, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm in the middle of looking through the edit history now...--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:45, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
From what I can see there is nothing that an admin can do here as it is essentially a content dispute. What I would do specifically regarding the Cheylov article is to seek a third opinion on the talk page. If there is consensus for your preferred version and LiamNolan continues to revert, then an admin could step in. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Great, thank you. QuasyBoy 17:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Preston North End Dan

I know you've interacted with this editor on a few occasions in the past and wondered if you could take a look at the tagging I've had to do on images he's uploaded? (10 either deletes or tagging for further investigation as strongly suspected to be copyvios) I think there might be reasonable grounds for a topic ban on uploading of media until he acknowledges that he understands wikipedia copyright policy and agrees to abide by that policy, what do you think? Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 13:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Stuart - I have indeed tried to work with Preston North End Dan regarding his history of BLP violations. It appears he's now moved on to copyvios. I'll poke around and see if there are any admins who work with images who would be willing to take a look and act accordingly (whether that would be an image upload ban, a block, or a stern final warning). Thank you for letting me know! --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:16, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Ponyo, Just thought I'd let you know that I've found a Quacking I.P. - I've listed it for a checkuser to take a look at Wikipedia:SPI. Thanks for the help cleaning their edits up in the past. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 13:52, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
That was a clear case of WP:DUCK (see this for example) so I blocked the IP - he's been using it for a long time, so I've locked it down for a month. He's also used this same range previously to attack editors after I left a warning on their main account. Note that this is not a CU block, just a run of the mill blatant block evasion block. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:25, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello

Hello,

sorry I don't have any wikipedia account. I have seen that the page "Geoffrey Grey" composer will be delated. I'm really very surprised because he is a very important composer. He wrote lots of works and has been recorded.

You can find a CD called "Diversion" in the German publisher Blumlein.

I know Geoffrey Grey and I think he must be editing in Wikipedia.

You might contact the composer Nigel Keay on his website. He will agree with me.

Actually, Geoffrey is composing an oboe concerto.

I know that we can 't see lot's of things about him on the net because he is a very secret person who don't like to share his life on the web.

I hope this article will saty on Wikipedia.

Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.121.253.93 (talk) 18:07, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

The Geoffrey Grey article is not currently up for deletion. There was a brief period where there was a proposed deletion tag on the article, however it was removed on the 28th. Regards, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 18:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at DBigXray's talk page. Message added 15:22, 3 April 2012 (UTC). ÐℬigXЯaɣ 15:22, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

A big NPT update

Hey! Big update on what the developers have been working on, and what is coming up:

coding

  • Fixes for the "moved pages do not show up in Special:NewPages" and "pages created from redirects do not show up in Special:NewPages" bugs have been completed and signed off on. Unfortunately we won't be able to integrate them into the existing version, but they will be worked into the Page Triage interface.
  • Coding has been completed on three elements; the API for displaying metadata about the article in the "list view", the ability to keep the "patrol" button visible if you edit an article before patrolling it, and the automatic removal of deleted pages from the queue. All three are awaiting testing but otherwise complete.

All other elements are either undergoing research, or about to have development started. I appreciate this sounds like we've not got through much work, and truthfully we're a bit disappointed with it as well; we thought we'd be going at a faster pace :(. Unfortunately there seems to be some 24-72 hour bug sweeping the San Francisco office at the moment, and at one time or another we've had several devs out of it. It's kind of messed with workflow.

Stuff to look at

We've got a pair of new mockups to comment on that deal with the filtering mechanism; this is a slightly updated mockup of the list view, and this is what the filtering tab is going to look like. All thoughts, comments and suggestions welcome on the NPT talkpage :). I'd also like to thank the people who came to our last two office hours sessions; the logs will be shortly available here.

I've also just heard that the first functional prototype for enwiki will be deployed mid-April! Really, really stoked to see this happening :). We're finding out if we can stick something up a bit sooner on prototype.wiki or something.

I appreciate there may be questions or suggestions where I've said "I'll find out and get back to you" and then, uh. not ;p. I sincerely apologise for that: things have been a bit hectic at this end over the last few weeks. But if you've got anything I've missed, drop me a line and I'll deal with it! Further questions or issues to the usual address. Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 17:14, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ponyo. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 21:19, 3 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sarah (talk) 21:19, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I have seen that you added the official website of the actor Andrea Bruschi here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Bruschi That's not correct because that is my website. I have the same name of the actor but I'm not related to him :) So the link you put there it's wrong, I hope you can fix it because I don't have practice with wikipedia editing. Thanks in advance Andrea 94.138.186.196 (talk) 07:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this to my attention; I have removed the incorrect website link. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Ponyo. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 12:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Courtesy notice

82.18.191.248 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), who you've dealt with before, is being discussed at ANI - Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#82.18.191.248. 2 lines of K303 14:32, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

deletion of info in Abdul Rahman bin Abdulaziz

It was taken from English wikipedia. Then, please delete it from original page.

I'm sorry, I don't understand which article you are referring to, could you please provide a link? --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry. the related page is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayef_bin_Sultan_bin_Fawwaz_al-Shaalan Thanks

I do apologize, but I have no idea what you are asking me to do. Is there a problem with Nayef bin Sultan bin Fawwaz al-Shaalan? Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 22:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Nayef bin Sultan is Prince Abdul Rahman's son-in-law and took part in smuggling, reading his page referenced above. I add this info to Prince Abdul Rahman's page but you deleted it several days ago. I hope you understand now. If you delete it, then you should also delete it from Nayef bin Sultan's page. Allright??

If Prince Abdul Rahman's son-in-law was implicated in some sort of scandal, then it could be included in the son-in-law's article (worded neutrally and supported by the requisite reliable sources). It would be WP:UNDUE to include it in the father-in-law's article as it is only tenuously related to the individual and his notability. It introduces negative material that is not actually related to the individual himself, running the risk of guilt by association (see WP:BLPSTYLE where this is discussed). In addition, the negative content you were trying to add was unsourced which is why it was removed immediately in accordance with BLP policy. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 18:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready!

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

  • Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
    • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
    • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

New pages patrolling

I noticed you were a new pages patroller. I was thinking of getting involved in patrolling, but as with many things at Wikipedia, the initial steps, even for a moderately experienced editor like me, are a bit confusing. I've read some of the material, policies, etc., but I'm still unsure how best to wade in. Any suggestions? What about tools - are any of them helpful (beyond Twinkle, which I already use)? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about the delay in replying, I was unexpectedly offline for a couple of days. I don't do too much new page patrolling these days; when I do I simply go to Special:NewPages and patrol about 5 days back (you have the option to "jump in" to the middle of the list in the first text box at the top of the page). I do it all the old-fashioned way, I've never used any semi-automated tools for editing, so I can't help with recommendations there. There are some exciting new developments in the works - make sure to pop over to Wikipedia:New Page Triage and sign up for the newsletter in order to keep up to date with the roll-out. Good luck! --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 19:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:34, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

James Dolan

You should try learning his middle name. It's Lorraine. Get over it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.44.93.242 (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

You need a source which meets Wikipedia's reliable sourcing criteria in order to include the info. It's policy that such a source be included when adding or changing personal information in biographies. Continued insertion of challenged material in a BLP will lead to a block of your IP address. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 22:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

It's ALIVE!

Need a page brought back to life. Could you reanimate (notice the Frankenstein theme?) User:Neutralhomer/WV Radio for me please and remember, it's pronounced "Fronk-en-steen". :) Thanks...Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

All done! --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 03:44, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
IT'S ALI...too silly, too silly...get on with it. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:51, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Oh yeah, could you perma-semi-protect that page for me please? All my other userspace pages are perma-semi-protected. Thanks. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Done as well. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

hi

what degree of significance does it need to be because i was fiddling around trying to see how it worked when you deleted it — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheHudsonator (talk • contribs) 04:30, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

The notability threshold for articles can be found at WP:N. Note however that autiobiographies are strongly discouraged, and given the content you were including in the article there is no chance the article could or should be included. If you would like to write a viable Wikipedia article, please see the article wizard for assistance. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


copy of latest interaction with other contributor on ujjwal patni. Help us to improve

See the page in new light, Lets discuss it issue wise, Other contributors requested to improve the page

Dear Sir,

I don't want to be a part of Edit war rather i would love to be a part of discussion. However I am continuously seeing new links from reputed newspapers, websites and other sources and unable to understand why are you deleting them grossly. I think we must talk on the same. I find ujjwal patni very much notable (WP : BASIC WP: ANYBIO, WP : AUTHOR )

Revision as of 22:04, 20 April 2012

((1) this is not notable enough for the WP:LEAD; (2) organization itself may not be notable at all; (3) a picture is not an adequate source (WP:OR under reliable sources))


Clarification -

(1) If you don't find it notable enough in the lead, it could be included in the award section, Pls suggest.

(2) The organization is a training accreditation non profit organization so It would not be fair to question the notability of the organization. They are not stating that ujjwal patni is no 1 or single. They have published a list that shows the renowned trainers as per their evaluation parameters. We are no one to challenge their parameters. By any measure, this inclusion surely indicates the quality of his work as a Trainer.

(3) The name of ujjwal patni as a renowned trainer can be seen there with his image and the whole list is presented in the same way so nobody can deny this inclusion. We must relate the inclusion with other achievements to authenticate in case of doubt. This inclusion is supported by the Best Corporate Trainer of India Award mentioned in the award section that supports the quality of work of subject.

The certification is also displayed on the website www.ujjwalpatni.com as an additional source. After relating contents of the page, I don't require more citations.


Revision as of 22:07, 20 April 2012

Regarding Tarun Kranti Award/Puraskar


Clarification -

(1) I have cited a link that clearly mentions Dr Ujjwal patni as the chairman of Tarun award. All the other ctations contain photographs to support the same. However I am looking for more citations on this.

(2) I have cited the original press release from the government department of Public relations of Madhya pradesh , the biggest state of India. This citation asserts the importance of award as The Governor of state himself presented the award and made an official press release too. This is sufficient enough to make it notable.

(3) I have also cited newspapers giving prominent coverage to Tarun Kranti award with photograph . If we don't understand a foreign language, we can relate the photos very easily. In India the main language is hindi, so the subject is right in presenting the citations of top hindi newspapers of india.

(4) As an additional source, a link of Ujjwal patni's website is added, which presents a special page on Tarun Kranti award puraskar with photos.

(5)The winners are all prominent personalities and already have a place in wikipedia thus justifying the notability of award


The citations are very reputed with proper title, publishing date and the publisher details. All the citations from multiple sources focus exclusively on the award and winners in same context. By relating all this , i feel that Tarun Kranti puraskar is important enough to be presented specifically so a special section has been created. I would request you to talk before deleting.

Anay jain (talk) 06:39, 21 April 2012 (UTC) Anay jain (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Need your help for the wiki page Ujjwal Patni

Dear Sir,

We need your genuine help as we are not good at working on wiki. Previously also you did justice to the page of Ujjwal patni and saved it from speedy deletion last year.

We are not able to understand...how to make the subject more notable because he is already having the highest of achievements of his field. The biggest problem is that the indian newspapers do not keep the links alive for long time however the achievements are clearly visible on Google. We have presented some fresh links and we need your help.

Kindly guide us regarding establishing ujjwal patni's notability. How can we make the subject more notable

Prestigious awards - He is the winner of Guinness world record, one of the prestigious Government award Pt sunderlal sharma literature award, Best corporate trainer of India award and many more.

About Books - He is the author of six books on leadership , motivation and network marketing that are published in 12 languages. That is the highest number of Indian languages for commercial publication.

He works nationwide and also in other countries as a corporate trainer, motivational speaker and author.

Kindly see the developments done on the page and help us to improve this page sir.

Thanks

Viji Thomas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.165.232 (talk) 08:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

The article is not currently at risk of deletion, there is a clean-up tag alerting other editors that there may be an issue with regard to notability. What I would suggest is to review Wikipedia:Notability (people) and then to note on the article talk page which points of the notability criteria you believe that Ujjwal Patni meets. Other editors can discuss this with you, and if there is agreement that the notability tag is inappropriate then it can be removed. I can also take a look around to see if I can find any independent reliable sources to add to the article. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
P.S. A link does not need to be live to be used as a reference. If you include additional details such as the name of the newspaper and article, the date of publication, and the page on which the article appeared in the print edition, then the reference is verifiable and valid.Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Dear Contributor,

Greetings

Thanks for your wonderful advice for ujjwal patni. We have done considerable changes with lot of new links. Pls have a look and guide further. We are working hard to understand the whole system so as to match your quality parameters.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.97.137.72 (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


Pwll-y-Wrach

Just curious why you rv Category:Agatha Christie from this article. You cited "WP:BLPNAME/OTRS" but neither BLP (she is long dead) nor OTRS applies per my reading. THanks. Yours, Quis separabit? 15:48, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The category was removed inadvertently; I have restored it. WP:BLPNAME applies as I removed the name of the private individuals you added to the article, if they are no longer living then please feel free to restore the names (or I can if you'd prefer). WP:OTRS applies as I was responding to privacy concerns raised via the OTRS system regarding the article.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 19:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
I see; well thanks so much for your prompt explanation. Yours, Quis separabit? 20:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Michael Spellman

You just deleted an edit I made to the page of Michael Spellman for copyright reasons. I, myself, wrote the material in his bio and thus it is not a violation of copyrighted material. Can you please restore the edit? Thank you.

JMW Joseph Wisniewski — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.43.170 (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Please read the links that have been left on your talk page. Wikipedia cannot use any text from other websites that are copyrighted without the expressed and verified consent of the copyright holder. This page has instructions on how to do so. Note however that even if permission is verified, any content added to the article must not be promotional in nature. If you are using the same wording as is used on the subject's official website, it is likely too promotional for use on Wikipedia. Finally, please review our conflict of interest guidelines for pertinent information regarding editing articles with which you are affiliated. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:52, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Ponyo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Paul Austin (talk) 05:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced on Joey Richter

Umm, that info I posted is sourced. There's a link right next to it, and that link has the info. --Muppet321 (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

The article has been a target of persistent vandalism and your edit was unfortunately caught in the crossfire. I was aware that you reverted and read your edit summary confirming the source, so all is well! --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:22, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Colejohnson66

Hey Ponyo, maybe you can help this editor. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Daniel Case has already declined the unblock, but I've left young Cole a link to WP:COMPROMISE which should help him out. Cheers for the note, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Tickets on UTRS

Hey! I saw you put two tickets in the open proxy queue, but did you ever post them to WP:OP? I can't find them there.--v/r - TP 02:28, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Done now - cheers for the reminder. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 03:36, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

You might be interested

Wikipedia:Help_desk#Edit_to_page_has_not_saved -- User seems to be referring to your revert. Thought you might like to know. Equazcion (talk) 11:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. There's not much I can add there as it appears others have explained the issues to the editor(s). --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

New Pages update

Hey Ponyo/Archive 13 :). A quick update on how things are going with the New Page Triage/New Pages Feed project. As the enwiki page notes, the project is divided into two chunks: the "list view" (essentially an updated version of Special:NewPages) and the "article view", a view you'll be presented with when you open up individual articles that contains a toolbar with lots of options to interact with the page - patrolling it, adding maintenance tags, nominating it for deletion, so on.

On the list view front, we're pretty much done! We tried deploying it to enwiki, in line with our Engagement Strategy on Wednesday, but ran into bugs and had to reschedule - the same happened on Thursday :(. We've queued a new deployment for Monday PST, and hopefully that one will go better. If it does, the software will be ready to play around with and test by the following week! :).

On the article view front, the developers are doing some fantastic work designing the toolbar, which we're calling the "curation bar"; you can see a mockup here. A stripped-down version of this should be ready to deploy fairly soon after the list view is; I'm afraid I don't have precise dates yet. When I have more info, or can unleash everyone to test the list view, I'll let you know :). As always, any questions to the talkpage for the project or mine. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

In need of some suggestions

Hello P. I need to pick your brain about a long term but sporadic problem. Beginning last January a series of IP's from Rhode Island began messing with the

article. They constantly add actors and characters that were not nominated for the award. Here are the incarnations that I have tracked to date

This first one was a hassle as they had already been messing with several articles for sometime before I caught them and I had to dig into the history to fix things
I think that they thought if the created an account that we wouldn't check their work.

As you will see they occasionally add the fictitious nomination to the actors article as well. My dilemma is this because they take days or weeks off I'm not sure that a report to AIV will work as they will just wait out a block or switch IPs and go right back to their pesky ways. The same applies to RFPP. Again they would wait out a temporary protection. The only solution would seem to be a "Indefinite semi-protection" but I know that this is a "last resort when all else fails" kind of thing. The one reason that it might work is that info for past years won't change so there isn't any real need to edit it. When the new nominations and awards are announced they can be entered by an established user or an IP can post an edit request on the talk page. When you have a moment please let me know what you think and I will proceed from there. Thanks for taking the time to read this. On another note I was sorry to see the Canucks depart the playoffs so soon but maybe that will give you more time to enjoy the spring weather. Cheers MarnetteD | Talk 00:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Marnette - sorry for the delay, I've been away on holiday. I will be wading through my watchlist over the next day or two to try to catch any overt vandalism or BLP issues then will take a look at this ASAP. (And the best thing I can say about the Canucks is that...well I suppose their golf swing is improving?) --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:08, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Welcome back and what a nice place to be on hoiday in. No hurry they haven't been back since I left this but every time I think they are gone for good is when I find a new bogus edit. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 00:28, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Ok, I'm essentially back in the wiki-saddle (so to speak) and have looked at this. The edits are disruptive enough that blocking is certainly an option (and one that has been used previously with regards to Moviegeek266). Ping me if they pop up again (under any account or IP) and I'll lay down some preventative blocks - it could be that if we nail down a few of the IPs for a decent amount of time we will be able to avoid semi-protection. Although I intend to be around daily for the foreseeable future, please don't hesitate to send me an email if my response time lags; I always keep an eye on my email due to my AUSC commitments. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again and by coincidence I just had to revert a batch of edits by the third one 70.172.223.42 yesterday. I appreciate your looking into this. MarnetteD | Talk 23:36, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
I've started a page in my "naughty book" for them - let me know if anything unseemly pops up :) --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:37, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage prototype released

Hey Ponyo! We've finally finished the NPT prototype and deployed it on enwiki. We'll be holding an office hours session on the 16th at 21:00 in #wikimedia-office to show it off, get feedback and plot future developments - hope to see you there! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 03:43, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Michael Penn/'Girls' update.

Hi, bit new to wikipedia updating, not found any reference to my edit independently but I guess I could get a screen-grab of the credits of the latest episode - otherwise I'll keep an eye on his IMDB page and update once that's changed ok. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.221.157.207 (talk) 19:26, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

I wouldn't say it's urgent to get a source in place as the information isn't particular contentious - it's better to wait for a reliable source than to add something sub-par (and screencaps are a no-no). Thank you for your contributions! --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:21, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Re:Divyanka Tripathi

I checked that you`ve removed the fb link from the infobox...It`s okay.You removed for a valid reason:)but can I still add the official fb link to the reference list? the wiki article is outdated. & at present She doesn`t have any official website.The only *official* source to get updates abt her(Divyanka Tripathi)is through her official facebook page(the link which u deleted.& I`ve had added her nickname,which is also deleted by you.I can post Nicknames/Alternative Names,right? _ Regards Aviks05 (talk) 21:03, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

If a subject has no official website outside of Facebook, it is sometimes acceptable to add it as an external link in the external link section. You can read more about this here. Best of luck with your editing. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

- Oh Okay,thanks a lot for your help,I`ll further update that article after I get the updated biography & stuff.Thanks again :) Aviks05 (talk) 18:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage/New Pages Feed

Hey all :). A notification that the prototype for the New Pages Feed is now live on enwiki! We had to briefly take it down after an unfortunate bug started showing up, but it's now live and we will continue developing it on-site.

The page can be found at Special:NewPagesFeed. Please, please, please test it and tell us what you think! Note that as a prototype it will inevitably have bugs - if you find one not already mentioned at the talkpage, bring it up and I'm happy to carry it through to the devs. The same is true of any additions you can think of to the software, or any questions you might have - let me know and I'll respond.

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Julia Haworth

Hi,

I'm wondering why you reverted an edit on this article today? As far as I can see there was no reason to? --Trappedinburnley (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

The edit was made by an indefinitely blocked editor who was evading their block - many of their edits are the addition of unsourced content and other disruptive edits and therefore they have been reverted. This particular edit does indeed appear valid so I have restored it. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:36, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I noticed the block on the IP's talkpage and didn't want to blunder into something. --Trappedinburnley (talk) 17:47, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Questions.

Hello, Thank you for your feedback on the edits I made to the page Jonas Anderson (singer). I understand and respect the concern Wikipedia has in wanting to keep things factual and nuetral, so I wanted to ask for your help in sorting out the problem I have with this. I did a major edit on this page to make it factual and current as well as much more informative since the original article had almost no information, was very brief and majorly lacking in detail. In no way was I attempting to create an article that would be biased or leaning in any particular way. All of the information I included is 100% factual, and in fact verifiable, only this is difficult in English as almost all the information on Jonas is in Thai since he is known in Thailand. There is some information in Swedish too since he is Swedish. I did include links to two articles by Time Magazine available online and also a link to another independent website that had an English interview with Jonas. In the interest of providing the public with factual and more detailed information on Jonas Anderson, I would like to ask that you reconsider disallowing my article edits. Or else would it be possible to more specifically inform me what parts of the article were deemed not neutral so I can adjust it accordingly since I am new to Wikipedia editing? Being as Jonas Anderson is not Thai, there are frequent times when non-Thais want to look him up online for information which the article now really does not provide. Thank you.

Lookthung (talk) 09:11, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Just wondering if you had some feedback for me regarding my questions relating to my edits on the page Jonas Anderson (singer) I am eager to hear back on this. Thanks. Lookthung (talk) 06:17, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

The article edits as written cannot be restored as they violate several Wikipedia policies (mainly neutrality and verifiability). Please do add information, but you need to ensure that the material added is supported by reliable sources and is not worded in promotional tones. Using promotional buzz words such as "meteoric rise to fame", "Jonas attained instant nationwide recognizability" and "Before long Jonas Anderson had become a household name" makes the article non-neutral and this, combined with the lack of sourcing, is why your edits were reverted. The page WP:MOSBIO is helpful in describing how a Wikipedia biography article should read and WP:BTIP outlines useful tips on writing biographies. I hope this helps. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Leo711

Some months ago you found it necessary to leave a warning on this user's talk. Leo711 later garnered a block for some general cluelessness/inexperience combined with a dash of combative reaction. In the event you have an opinion (and because I respect your opinion, generally), I'm inviting you to comment on the possibility of unblock. I would understand if this situation would take second chair to more important tasks on your to-do list. See ya 'round Tiderolls 22:36, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Update. Sorry to have bothered you, but circumstances have proceeded faster than I anticipated. I have unblocked this user after requesting input from the blocking admin. Feel free to offer comment or criticism as you see fit. Again, excuse the ring Tiderolls 01:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Leo711/BadaBoom did indeed fulfill the requirements for the unblock, so unblocking was fairplay. Hopefully they can reign in on the attitude somewhat and edit a little more collaboratively in the future. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

User:11113 o7

Hey. I know you deal with a lot of editors, but 11113 o7 has already been warned twice by me. Once more and he should be blocked. He has deleted all messages from other editors from his talk page (which is his right) regarding his behavior, which shows he has no interest in conducting himself properly. Can you keep an eye while I am offwiki. Thanks. Quis separabit? 23:45, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, blanking the warnings (including the one I gave them prior to your two) and continuing to edit disruptively will certainly lead to a block. I'll go check it out now. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
He appears to have a sockpuppet now: Cat 68, all of whose edits should be rv. Quis separabit? 16:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Oops -- I see you blocked the sockie at the same time I left the last note. Sorry about that. Thanks. Yours, Quis separabit? 16:28, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Nope, I blocked it because of your note :) Thanks for letting me know. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ponyo. You have new messages at Jagadhatri's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Jagadhatri(২০১২) 14:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Adam Carolla

Adam Carolla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Hi - I have replied on my talkpage - regards - Youreallycan 20:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi - Are you still there? - Youreallycan 20:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

yup yup - just left a note there (was off brewing a cuppa). --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15→Archive 20
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ponyo/Archive_13&oldid=1190249384"