User talk:Shreyansh Raghuwanshi

Welcome!

Hello, Shreyansh Raghuwanshi!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Ravensfire (talk) 17:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Serge, and Admin here on Wikipedia. While I appreciate your attempts to add sources to Wikipedia, you must be sure that the references actually verify the content present. You can't change source and retain the same content in the Wikipedia article if the new source no longer verifies the information. The guitar source you keep adding does not verify the quote from the Rolling Stone article.

Additionally, I've noticed that an anonymous IP address editor keeps on re-adding your edit. It seems pretty rare that another person would make the same, uncommon error at the same exact time, so I assume that's you too? You're not allowed to log out and keep restoring your content like that. If this is kept up, you're likely to get your account t blocked, or get locked out of editing certain articles, so please stop. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 13:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Serge,

I hope this message finds you well. I want to extend my sincerest apologies for the errors made during my recent editing on Wikipedia. After the reviewing, I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of the original sources and ensuring that any alterations accurately reflect the verified information.

I acknowledge that my changes did not align with these standards, particularly regarding the guitar source and its verification of the quote from the Rolling Stone Article. Moving forward, I am committed to being more diligent in my editing practices and adhering to Wikipedia's Guidelines.

I understand the concern this raises regarding the use of different IP-Addresses. While I utilized a different IP-Address for some edits, I am confident I did not continuously re add the edits. Furthermore, i used only one IP address simultaneously to edit the same uncommon error.

Rest assured, I am taking these matters seriously and will try to avoid similar issues in the future. Thank You for understanding, and I appreciate the opportunity to rectify these mistakes.

Regards,

Shreyansh Raghuwanshi Shreyansh Raghuwanshi (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Sergecross73 msg me 19:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TV Season Spoilers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TV Season Spoilers, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 14:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:TV Season & Spoilers Logo-2.png

Thanks for uploading File:TV Season & Spoilers Logo-2.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TV Season & Spoilers Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TV Season & Spoilers Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:TV Season & Spoilers Logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TV Season & Spoilers Logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 19:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winacle Network LLP (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References fall short of WP:NCORP

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Winacle Network LLP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shreyansh Raghuwanshi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winacle Network LLP (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Winacle Network LLP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Winacle Network LLP

Hello, Shreyansh Raghuwanshi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Winacle Network LLP, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Winacle Network LLP

Hello, Shreyansh Raghuwanshi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Winacle Network LLP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]