User talk:Stickymatch/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Stickymatch. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hi Stickymatch! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! --Srleffler (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the welcome! Stickymatch (talk) 17:13, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Adoption
After looking at the Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user page, it seemed appealing, however when browsing the list of potential mentors, it seemed as if very few of them are still accepting adoptions, or active enough to make the process worthwhile. If anybody would be willing to mentor me, that would be great. If not, would it be possible for you to leave some tips/advice? Many thanks!Stickymatch (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Stickymatch (talk) 01:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- The adoption program waxes and wanes, depending on who's participating. You are not going to change the dynamic by using the {{help me}} template. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Stickymatch, I'd be happy to adopt you. Are you ok with that? If so, I'll create an adoption page for you where we can start collaborating. Sam-2727 (talk) 03:37, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sam-2727 Sure, sounds great, I look forward to learning more about the intricacies of editing and working with Wikipedia. Thanks!Stickymatch (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Stickymatch, in case you haven't seen, page is created at User:Stickymatch/Adoption. Sam-2727 (talk) 17:42, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sam-2727 Sure, sounds great, I look forward to learning more about the intricacies of editing and working with Wikipedia. Thanks!Stickymatch (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Stickymatch, I'd be happy to adopt you. Are you ok with that? If so, I'll create an adoption page for you where we can start collaborating. Sam-2727 (talk) 03:37, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
I think you forgot to put User: here :P Heres a kitten to cheer you up.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 23:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- I sure did, thanks for the kitten! Stickymatch 23:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
You are now a pending changes reviewer!
Hi Stickymatch! I've been running into you while patrolling logs and recent changes and I happened to notice that you don't have the pending changes reviewer rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active in recent changes patrolling and that you consistently view and undo vandalism and bad faith disruption. I believe that the pending changes reviewer rights would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of the tool. Instead of having you formally request the rights at WP:PERM, I went ahead and just gave it to you. This user right allows you to review edits that are pending approval on pages currently under pending changes protection and either accept the edits to make them viewable by the general public, or decline and revert them.
Keep these things in mind regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:
- A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at Special:PendingChanges.
- A list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at Special:StablePages.
- Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
- You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
- Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clear vandalism, blatant neutral point of view issues, copyright violations, or BLP violations.
Useful guidelines and pages for you to read:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline and tutorial on using the rights and reviewing pending changes.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, a summary of pending changes protection, the pending changes user right, and how it applies.
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy section on pending changes protection and its appropriate application and use by administrators.
I'm sure you'll do fine with the reviewer rights - it's a pretty straight-forward tool and it doesn't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, or if you're not sure if you should accept or revert pending changes to a page, and I'll be more than be happy to help you. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:44, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep up the great work, and continue reverting vandalism for a few more weeks, and I'll make you a rollbacker. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:45, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, I'll head on over to those pages you recommended and read through them. Stickymatch 00:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clay County Historical Society Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Primitive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Fixed, but keeping this talk page message as a reminder. Stickymatch 21:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
Your signature
Please be aware that your signature has three problems:
- missing end tag lint error for italic markup that doesn't do anything
- text shadow that is so close to white that it is nearly invisible
- tags at the end surrounding no content
You are encouraged to change
''<span style="font-family: 'Arial';">[[User talk:Stickymatch|<span style="text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #F0F5E6"><span style="color: #197C5D;">''Stickymatch''</span></span>]] <span style="color: #0"><small></small></span></span>
: Stickymatch
If you want the text shadow, even though it's practically invisible, to
<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User talk:Stickymatch|<span style="text-shadow: 2px 2px 2px #F0F5E6"><i style="color: #197C5D;">Stickymatch</i></span>]]</span>
: Stickymatch
If you don't want the text shadow, to
<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User talk:Stickymatch|<i style="color: #197C5D;">Stickymatch</i>]]</span>
: Stickymatch
—Anomalocaris (talk) 06:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- I understand, will do. Stickymatch 14:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Copyright issue
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi, thanks for the welcome! I found a book in which most of the definitions & formatting from the "Disease" page is identical - "Stress Management" By Dr. Roshan Lal, Dr. Ritu Sekhri. As it was published in 2018, I've no idea if they've violated your work, or whether someone cut & paste edited your page, but you should be aware of it. I'm sorry the link is so unwieldy - it's a Google book.
I flagged what sections were verbatim - some single sentence definitions were slightly altered, but as they were bracketed by more suspect material I left them. Many sections have footnotes which do not appear in "Stress Manaegement" - they have not been altered. I'm just not sure I'm using the copyright alert correctly, or whether I should have flagged this on the talk section of the page itself as I couldn't determine how active it was. There is also an ongoing copyright issue with another author.Justifiable27 (talk) 22:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing that to attention. It seems that it is the book that copied from Wikipedia however, not the other way around. Thus it is not a copyright violation on our part, and nothing needs to be done. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 01:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- I posted a note about this on User talk:Justifiable27. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
- Arbitration report: 2020 election results
- Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.
- Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
- Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions
- Essay: Subjective importance
- Gallery: Angels in the architecture
- Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas