User talk:Victor Schmidt mobil

Victor Schmidt mobil, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Victor Schmidt mobil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:51, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

List of ToyMakerz episodes

Please see my comment at Draft:List of ToyMakerz episodes; I think it might be better to merge this information with ToyMakerz, rather than create a separate page. See WP:MERGE. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page or ask another volunteer at the Teahouse. Thanks! — Bilorv (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Change Andy Yu to disambiguation section.

Instead of having Andy Yu as a redirect page, change Andy Yu to a disambiguation page. Then both the investor and the actor would have pages. The actor only had a supporting role in a small show while the investor is ranked as one of the top young investors in the USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The1337leet (talk • contribs) 03:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@The1337leet: I have no problem with that, but keep WP:RS and WP:V including WP:BLP in mind. Disambiguation pages are only created if you have reliable sources for at least two people. (And no, Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook or the subjects own websites are not accepted, because they are not independent.) Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 04:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for your welcome message

Hi Victor Schmidt mobil, thank you for your kind welcome message. As a newbie here I'm still getting used to the UX and processes. As a German wikipedia user I had already a verified account https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:MarcosFernandezMETROAG and I was not aware that contributing to wikipedia pages in other countries a new user page is needed.. I added my "About me" description to my English page > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MarcosFernandezMETROAG I updated the article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olaf_Koch_(Manager) that was reviewed by German wikipedians. Afterwards, I figured out there is no correct English version available for this article, instead there was a redirect to an article about the company the person is working for.

Well, I researched a couple of online news as reliable sources to the article about Olaf Koch from independant publishers with significant coverage like Reuters, Bloomberg, Financial Times and European Supermarket Magazine. I am quite surprised about the feedback "This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2019)".

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What can I do in order to improve the article? Many thx in advance for any suggestions. MarcosFernandezMETROAG (talk) 14:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)MarcosFernandezMETROAG[reply]

@MarcosFernandezMETROAG: I don't have a clear suggestion here, but you can talk to the person who added the tag. You can use the page history for this, simply check the "Diff"-Links. If you don't want to create a userpage in every project, you can create a global one at meta:User:MarcosFernandezMETROAG. The global userpage will be transcended when no local one exists. This account is a classic example: Here on onwiki you yust see the transcluded global userpage, but if you go over to the German Wikipedia, you see a customized version there. One last point, there is no need to call {{Help me}} if you leave a message here. If you don't get a timely response, you can send me a so-called "wikimail" via Special:EmailUser/Victor Schmidt mobil. See Wikipedia:Emailing users for more information on this MediaWiki-Feature. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 15:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Broken

I am exiled from media. I don't know what I'm doing here. I feel like I'm a lost cause. I've lost 4 years worth of beautiful global friendships to an over zealous media gang who claim to connect the world. But disconnecting me from my community. I say gang because the big four media outlets ganged up on me at the same time. I know this isn't a social site. But I need to write my concerns about this down somewhere. Thank you for your greetings Lachlan Cryer 4.0 (talk) 06:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of DB547

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of DB547 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Victor Thanks for helping out.

Thank you for checking the Canadian University Dubai pages, I was trying to update our organizations information. Hope you can guide me thru the ins and outs. Webcud (talk) 13:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Webcud: Okay, for the basic stuff:

the Wikimedia Foundations Terms of Service
Our local policy on paid editing
our rules regarding conflict of interest, since you are writing about something you are related with
the five Pilars of Wikipedia
What Wikipedia is not.

I will add more stuff later, but thats it for now. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You might have noticed that I reverted your recent edit. Therefore, I will now leave some more stuff here:

Please maintain a neutral point of view when (re-)writing encyclopedic articles. Avoid puffery.
All contents must be verifiable. (If you find something that doesn't have a source, feel free to remove it.) The burden to present sources is on them who want to insert something. Sources must be, execpt for a few basic things, independent. You might also want to read about Reliable sources. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the prompt response and well-versed guidance.

Added basic affiliation for COI compliance
Requested for edits

This is a good start to start contributing and learning the basics

Webcud (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ben Askren—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: huh? Neither that edit nor anything else from yesterday was reverted. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Victor, my appologies, he message was not mean for you but the ip editor. I must have clicked the wrong line in Huggle. Mistakes are all mine. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corgon Studios (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Corgon Studios and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Corgon Studios, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:58, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I

45.27.210.112 (talk) 00:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Filter

I am trying to archive old edits on a talk page. The edit filter blocked me. How do I proceed?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter/False_positives/Reports#210.6.209.89 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.6.209.89 (talk) 08:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ask a bot or create an account Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 08:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Celette

I have already used the following {{Connected contributor (paid)}} in my sandbox even though I don't get any special payments for making this live. Please help me how to proceed. 103.224.32.245 (talk) VenkteshN (talk) 07:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC) 07:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't vandalized

2601:204:E37F:FFF1:1072:2E99:6974:BFF6 (talk) 23:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i believe you Peppermint.co (talk) 10:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary changes

I dont understand why you would delete what I wrote when it was all facts. Peppermint.co (talk) 10:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Peppermint.co: Please see WP:TRUTH. Wikipedia doesnt want to use what some persons says on the internet, Wikipedia wants to be verifiable, i.e. It must be always clear where the information came from. We cant realy take your word for it, as [[~~On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog~~You never know who is on the other end of the network cable]]. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 10:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

are you calling me a dog? i’ve read multiple articles discussing the ideas stated. they were not mine. but i do not appreciate being called a dog Peppermint.co (talk) 10:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lets use a different wording, that wasn't the best one. But it still stands, we cant take the word of people that say "its true" (and neither we do for people that say "its not true" when they add something, for obvivios reasons). Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 10:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

agree to disagree? i hope you are well. but please do not call me a dog again. an apology would be appreciated Peppermint.co (talk) 10:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raeven Kelly page

What changes were you making to my page? MrsDinwoodie (talk) 16:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MrsDinwoodie: First of all, it's not your page, at most its Wikipedia's page about Rae'Ven Larrymore Kelly. I have undone the latest two of your edits, resetting the article to the state before those two edits, because they did not conform to Wikipedia's Verfifiability-Policy. this is a difference showing the changes in your two edits that I have undone. Please note that the rules for Biographys of living persons are even stricter than the rules for articles not about a libing person. If you are affilated with the subject in any way, please read about Conflict of Interest. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 17:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Victor,my dear... Please Google my full married name RaéVen Kelly Dinwoodie As I understand it's Wikipedia's page. I know the correct info to post since it is their page about ME. I just updated it to include info on my family and organizations I've volunteered for in the past. I appreciate your contributions, Victor and I only ask that you not edit my personal information as it pertains to my bio here.

I welcome you or Wikipedia to contact me personally at Raevenkelly@gmail.com to further verify my identity with my agents and attorneys, if needed. Warm Regards, RaéVen Kelly Dinwoodie (aka RaéVen A'Lyia Larrymore Kelly) :) MrsDinwoodie (talk) 17:31, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't expect me to check each Google result? Wikipedia editors aren't going to do the work for you, as most of them (including me) do that in their (sometimes rare) free time. I see that you reinserted your changes, which shows to me that you haven't read about WP:COI so far, as 1) there is a disclosure to make. Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects may also be of interest. 2) You edited the page directly, and I dont see how the COi rules are met for that. And then we have the sourcing Issiues. The WP:BURDEN to bring sources is on the person that adds the information, not on the one that questions it. As for verification, this could be done, for example in the way outlined here but this will not resolve the sourcing issiue. Thats because while I generally trust you to tell the truth in that case, such methods can easely be abused to have a biography on oneself that is "better" than the reality. I am not saying that you would do that, and I'm generally happy that I never noticed such a case during my time at Wikipedia, but we can't take that risk. I know that its also possible to abuse/fake newspaper articles, but it's far harder. I am going to revert you one more time now. As a COI editor, you are expected to do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies. Please be adivised that even if I dont revert you, the next editor will be. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 20:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse Me!

I have a new message for you! Click on the talk button to go to my talk page. I used the edit button to make a new message but it didin't notificate you. MinecraftBacon499 (talk) 17:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Somdutta Singh

Is the Somdutta Singh page approved? Fayssaloss (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Fayssaloss: no, probbably not. The question is, why did you recreate this after Somdutta Singh (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somdutta Singh, which was less than a month ago, effectively ignoring the advice of 4 users one of them being an admin? I've took another look at the article, and it appears that most of the sources are either affilated with the subject and/or not regarded as reliable.Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your help searching for photos. Maryphillips1952 (talk) 00:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks a lot for helping out in editing my category section, really appreciate the effort. Im new to wiki and its lovely to find volunteers helping the community! Best wishes Allin96 (talk) 10:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

:)

Good day to you too dear I’m glad your awake happy birthday! Kenzie021 (talk) 13:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

?? My birthday isn't in February. 06:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your files for upload request

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:1st Word Plus 3.0 screenshot.png. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, House Blaster^talk 02:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

Thank you VViking_TalkEdits 14:27, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]