User talk:Vidala
June 2008
[edit]This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.
You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.
Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. jonny-mt 05:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Vidala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The article which I seem to be blocked for was not for the sole purpose of advertising my company. The article was created to assist those seeking wealth education to understand the meaning of the term, I don't mind if my link is not reported as a reference, all I was hoping for was a little recognition for creating the article. If this is not possible then I still believe the article would be beneficial and should still be created. New user: arrenv
Decline reason:
Since you don't appear to understand why your article breached multiple Wikipedia policies, including WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:COI, I cannot unblock you. Clearly if I was to do so there is a significant risk you would recreate that article or breach these rules again. Gwernol 01:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vidala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My appologies, I understand now that I have seen the Wikipedia policies, thank you for your time.
Decline reason:
New request opened below — Hersfold (t/a/c) 00:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Could you please indicate what specifically you understand? It might make your unblock (or rather, a username change) argument more convincing. Thanks. --Kinu t/c 21:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Vidala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Firstly: The article which was written was not credited to a reliable source, what should have been done was to either request the article or do a little more research during the initial writing of the article so that more reliable sources could be referenced.
Secondly:The topic of the article related to my user name and the site referenced, therefore breaching the conflict of interests of Wikipedia and it's users
Decline reason:
Fair enough. Can I have your agreement that, when you are unblocked, you will seek a username change at Wikipedia:Changing username? If so, what username will you request? Sam Korn (smoddy) 12:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
OK, but are you interested in editing anything else? Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Does it matter? -- Ned Scott 04:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Vidala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I agree that after I'm unblocked I will seek a new username as soon as possible, the new username if available will be avidal
Decline reason:
I am afraid Avidal (talk · contribs) already exists. You can check whether users exist at Special:Listusers. Sam Korn (smoddy) 14:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.