User talk:Vincent Lextrait

Thanks!

Thanks for spotting and removing the image I inserted into Nice. About time someone did! But I have to point out that it was made with the GIMP, not with Photoshop. JIP | Talk 16:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terve. Point taken! :-)

Removing external links

Nice, Monaco and the French Riviera is a holiday destination, it is the main economic activity of the region. Your decision to remove external links that feature Detailed and Relevant information for people on holidays is incorrect. 10 million visitors every year need information relevant to them, not to residents.

Most of the search traffic to Wikipedia that finds these Nice, Monaco and French Riviera pages, are people researching holiday information.

The pages I am linking to are up-to-date, extremely well researched, relevant and extremely useful, and should be in Wikipedia. If anything it is the content-less sites created for advertising programmes that should have the links removed.Monacomike 10:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read about Wikipedia external links guidelines. You are more than welcome to remove any commercial link you find on the pages. There are lots remaining.

You deleted external links for Sisteron and Vinon-sur-Verdon on the grounds that they were commercial. The guidelines allow commercial links but say that links should not be used if they contain "objectionable amounts of advertising". The links that were deleted contain a map, interesting photographs and supplementary information in addition to modest advertising. In my opinion they do not break the guidelines, but 'objectionable' is always going to be subjective. Of course if they have major inaccuracies then they should be removed, but this was not the reason that you gave. JMcC 21:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The map is merely coming from google maps, the information on Sisteron is extremely small, and the amount of advertisement exceeds the amount of information. This site is an advertisement shell around google maps, with almost no added value (on Sisteron). If you believe the map is useful, I have no objection, but then let us link google maps directly. Vincent Lextrait 05:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned up the external links section of Sisteron and deleted any unsourced, personal bulletin board and travel guide websites from the list. The links removed were not used as references within the article and did not contain publish data referencable within wikipedia. Bulleting boards do not represent destinations worthy of being links from the town's page. The Wikipedia map link has been added, offering choice of mapping system to readers. Captain scarlet

MAD

Please read my comment on the AfD page. We want to keep your article--please add what sources you have--weren't there thing in Byte? DGG 05:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MonBuddha.jpg

Hello, Vincent Lextrait. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:MonBuddha.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Vincent Lextrait. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you updated the license tag for this image. I've also added {{PD-art-3d}} as images of 3-d art have their own copyright status separate from the copyright belonging to the photograph of them. I'm assuming these two are ancient statues so I thought I'd add the 3-d object licensing tag. Hope this is ok. Madmedea 20:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the statue is from the 7th century, so there is no problem. Thanks. Vincent Lextrait 20:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MonBuddhaSide.jpg

Hello, Vincent Lextrait. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:MonBuddhaSide.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Vincent Lextrait. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mass removal of Dublin mapping

Hello, A query - I have just logged on for today, and find a whole range of watched pages where links along the lines of http://www.dublin.forumforus.com/Map_of_Raheny Map of Raheny have been stripped out. These predate my joining but have obviously been found useful over time, and are no more commercial than many other external pages. Could you share your reasoning in removing them, and your suggestion for their replacement? I will certainly promote Placeopedia - but some of these pages had both, and the dublin.forumforus map format is quite handy. Could I perhaps suggest that such a multi-page removal should have been raised for discussion first? Regards, SeoR 09:49, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the topic is debated a few lines above on this page. forumforus is just a fat ad shell around google maps without measurable added value. Linking google maps from wikipedia is okay, wrapping up ads around google maps and linking the result from wikipedia is inappropriate. Vincent Lextrait 04:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is a "blacklisted link" - in the Dolmen sense? (Sarah777 23:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

You are probably referring to the spanish site on dolmens which was removed from a few articles. This site is blacklisted (not by me, by meta wiki I assume), and the presence of the link prevented any edition of the article until the link was removed. During the course of the removal of another blacklisted link, I removed that link too so that people could keep on contributing to the article. Vincent Lextrait 10:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amadeus IT Group

Hi there, thank you for the feedback. I have responded to your comment on my talk page, and copied the comment to Talk:Amadeus IT Group#Third Opinion, as it is relevant there as well. Mildly Mad^T_C 17:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dvaravati buddha picture

hi there,

the image is taken in the British Museum and that is what the explanation underneath the object said, see also here [1]. Gryffindor (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I know that, that's what I wrote on my note to you ("While it is good to have a referenced picture (British Museum), I do not know if you are aware that the one you picked is very atypical."). My point is that it is a very atypical one, not one that is an encyclopaedic representation of a Dvaravati buddha. See the technical reasons I mention. Vincent Lextrait (talk) 04:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well feel free to add another image then that is in your opinion more representative along the one from the British Museum. Gryffindor (talk) 19:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Vincent Lextrait. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 21:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Vincent Lextrait. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Pitchoune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raison d’être (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Actually, if you look carefully, the article raison d'être is a hybrid page, both a definition and a disambiguation, in case the definition does not apply. I am not sure whether this is a good thing to do to have such hybrid pages in wikipedia. The definition applies to the reference I added. Vincent Lextrait (talk) 01:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kasta Tomb modifications

Hi, feedback added at Talk:Kasta_Tomb; thanks George C. Tsiagalakis (talk) 12:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vincent Lextrait. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vincent Lextrait. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vincent Lextrait. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]