User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive169

Catholic Church RfC

Hi YM, NancyHeise has said she would like to open an RfC on the Catholic Church issues, so I've created a structure at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Catholic Church, in case she wants to use it. I'm letting you know about it because you're an admin who's been involved in this issue before, so it would be great if you could help to keep an eye on the RfC if she does indeed initiate one. Best, SlimVirgin ^{TALK contribs} 16:54, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can't close my eyes... YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity in India

Would you please remove semi protection for Christianity in India. I put up a request in the semi protected articles list but to no avail. I am very passionate about the subject and I am disappointed at the way the article is presented. The article does not provide a complete picture of Christianity in India. I do not see a point why it should be semi protected. Would you be kind enough to un-protect it. Thank you. --Kariappa07 (talk) 17:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its protected because of banned users and because most new users usually trash the articel YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AN notice

FYI, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#YellowMonkey_isn.27t_following_the_protection_policy_or_guidelines_with_their_protections.. -- Cirt (talk) 19:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thanks YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 04:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spot on analysis - if I were you I'd cut-and-paste that five-point analysis to your talk page somewhere and direct eyes to it. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is that for the use of FAQ or to get people to change tack and sprotect more. Having said that they shoudl turf the rubbish before sportecting, ideally YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hamence

Sad news [1] ...

Who would be the oldest now, Loxton? -- Mattinbgn\^talk 03:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Loxton and then Morris, both 1921, then Maddocks, K Archer, N Harvey (bless him), Rutherford, McDonald Davidson (per Cricinfo's 80+ listing) Benaud (not 80 just yet).....Loxton has gone blind although Morris and Harvey (hooray!) still were very alert at the centenary in 2008. Harvey was a very fit player in his day and long may he continue to speak plainly and not politically-correctly until October 2028. There was a bit about Hamence in the suburban paper a few weeks ago about him still sending in donations to West Torrens CC every year. Very sad YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:50, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GOLDENW

It sounds like you may be eligible for the first WP:GOLDENW.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Sachin Tendulkar was on there twice with the pictured slot; I took the photo. Monkeygate I was only a minnority expander as about 30k sprung up in one day after the match.... hangon, Thorpey was up there a few days before I put it to FAC because he retired, although in hindsight it should not have been allowed on YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Either I am not understanding your response or you are not understanding the award. Possibly, both.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:55, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator election

Thank you for your support MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise. Just a quick note to thank you for your support at the election, very much appreciated. See you around the Milhist pages! Ranger Steve (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well done folks YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you very much for your support on the coordinator elections. – Joe N 14:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well done again YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, I'm back :), but only for some minor contributions because I do not have that much free time as before, I'll try to write smth useful though. Regards. Grenouille vert (talk) 08:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The return of CU request

Another, not urgent. This is relating to a crusade to change BCE/CE to BC/AD on many articles. Initially an editor Jgw71 (talk · contribs) (see talk page), was blocked once for this disruption. Has used two IPs that I know of -- 72.154.84.126 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 68.218.182.143 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). The second IP is quite obviously the same (based on talk page contributions) and accusations of admin abuse. The IPs just get active when the editor is, and this case is likely headed to ANI soon, so figured I'd give you a head's up. —SpacemanSpiff 02:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Yuvi=New Inzy YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On Yuvi, I probably missed something. What's the new development? —SpacemanSpiff 08:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just check him out on the footage. Huffing and puffing ridiculously, Lehmann-style, and Sanga openly rubbished him in an interview. And how did Chawla get in there ahead of Ojha. At least Kohli isn't there, although selection aside India probably won't make the semis regardless YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 09:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't find anything at all useful on youtube, will probably see a bit when I'm in India soon. Haven't been following the cricket news much anyway. It's overkill in terms of number of matches and the match reports aren't exactly something to read. For the first time I followed an Aus-NZ series with so much interest though, that's what IPL's done to me! —SpacemanSpiff 02:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think I've only clocked up a total of 7-8 hours this year, especially with the rubbish ads and commentary. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New requests:

Mkbdtu (talk · contribs) = Myth&Truth (talk · contribs) and Linkinmars (talk · contribs), likely some sleepers around.
H3919 (talk · contribs) = Tanya001‎ (talk · contribs), blocked, but could perhaps have a couple of sleepers too (there were last time). This one is blocked.

Thanks again! —SpacemanSpiff 23:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

M&T cnfirmed, Linkin didn't match, and nothing new on the second set. YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 03:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the confirmation YM. Abecedare (talk) 04:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. —SpacemanSpiff 05:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And another Anasemadkha (talk · contribs), sock of Wikindia24x7 (talk · contribs). We need a full time CU for this nonsense now, sorry. —SpacemanSpiff 06:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should run for the CU intake. Nothing lost by a failed tilt. You probably don't want to tell them you hang around with ol' monkey the disruptive reactionary though. Last year I was checkusered for suspected troublemaking YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vote of confidence, but I've become very unproductive (content wise) on wiki after becoming an admin. Also, traveling and stuff right now, so on wiki time will be in blasts, not regular. —SpacemanSpiff 08:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing lost by having a tilt. Many people who get appointed to CU/OS are socialites and social climbers who spend their time fawning rather than doing anything :( YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, is there any collateral damage for 117.204.120.239/16? The past 50/500 IP edits show mostly this one chap ("date change vandal"), but I can't say much about logged in editors. —SpacemanSpiff 06:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because it crashes CU if you try the whole range YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did a /21 block, seems to have slowed him down, but he came through once at the /17 level. —SpacemanSpiff 08:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,yellow monkey,I am mkbdtu (talk · contribs),I am finally leaving wikipedia,but i want to inform you that {{user|myth&truth},mayurasia (talk · contribs) and joykirti (talk · contribs) are not of my sock account,a final bye to wikipedia,bcoz you all are not going yo forgive me.But I assure you that no disruption will be done by me in future from today.because you all are managing wikipedia which is hope for many.god bless you--mkbdtu (talk · contribs)--115.242.46.148 (talk) 17:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XLIX (March 2010)

From the coordinators

I am pleased to report that the March coordinator elections have concluded, and that 15 members have been selected to serve as coordinators from April to September. Special congratulations go to AustralianRupert, Dank, MisterBee1966, NativeForeigner, Patar knight, and Ranger Steve, all of whom are newly elected coordinators. As we start this new tranche we welcome all returning coordinators, and wish those who decided not to stand for reelection luck as they move on to new things.

In other election news, a motion made to extend the coordinator tranche from its current six-month term to one full year gained consensus from the election participants. This will take effect in September, during the next election cycle. For the IX Coordinator Tranche, TomStar81 (Talk) 05:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles of note

New featured articles:

New featured lists:

New featured topics:

Battlecruisers of Germany

New featured pictures:

Cavalry At Balaklava

New A-Class articles:

Project news

Operation Normandy
In May 2008 a small group of editors, operating from a page in Cam's userspace, began work on improving Wikipedia's articles relating to the pivotal Second World War Battle of Normandy that took place in northern France between 6 June and the end of August 1944. Milhist has now adopted this collaboration as our third special project. The aim of Operation Normandy is to bring all core topics—official operations, battles, and the invasion beaches—to featured status by the 70th anniversary of D-Day on 6 June 2014. More information can be found on the project page; any interested editors are most welcome to sign up and help us meet this challenging goal!
Henry Allingham World War I Contest
Our Henry Allingham World War I Contest ended on 11 March with the following results: in first place was Sturmvogel 66; in second place was Ian Rose; in third place was Dana boomer; and the finalists were Abraham, B.S., Carcharoth, and XavierGreen. The contest produced an incredible 238 recognised article improvements, of which 6 were Featured articles, 13 were A-Class articles and 22 were Good articles. In addition 43 newly created or expanded articles were successfully submitted for the 'Did you know' section on Wikipedia's main page. Our warmest congratulations go to the medallists and finalists, and our grateful thanks go to all participants and particularly to Eurocopter for organizing the contest.
Would you like to get more involved in the project? There are many open tasks that could use your help. The project's review department is always in need of input at peer reviews, A-class reviews, FACs and FARs; these can be found here. Also, the project maintains a list of deletion debates for military-related articles that have been nominated for deletion; project members are encouraged to provide their opinions in this forum so that consensus can be established. Finally, if content creation is more what you are looking for, each of the project's 48 task forces maintains a list of requested articles.
Your comments are invited in the following ongoing project discussions:
- Pre-emptive disambiguation. Since 2006 our in-house style guide has recommended disambiguating the titles of articles about military units whether another article of the same name exists or not. The continued need for this practice is under discussion.
- Merging the Australian and New Zealand task forces. This is the final call for editors to have their say in choosing a name for the shortly-to-be-merged Australian and New Zealand task forces.

Contest department

The Contest Department has completed its thirty-fifth month of competition. A total of 66 articles were entered by ten editors. Kumioko came first with 105 points, followed by Lordoliver with 79. They receive the Chevrons and Writer's Barnstar respectively. Honorable mentions go to Auntieruth55 (75), Ian Rose (53), Parsecboy (35), and Historical Perspective (31). Binksternet, Cirt, Radeksz and YellowMonkey also fielded entries. Please submit any articles you are working on for the April contest.

Awards and honours

The WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves has been awarded to:
- Nick-D in recognition of his long and distinguished service as a coordinator of this project from February 2008 to March 2010; sterling efforts on "big picture" subjects, including ten featured articles; and his tireless participation in discussion and review.
- Sturmvogel 66 in recognition of his distinguished service as a coordinator of this project, extraordinary performance within the Henry Allingham World War I Contest and other extremely valuable contributions to the project.
The A-Class medal has been awarded to:
- Auntieruth55 for her work on Siege of Godesberg (1583), Karl Aloys zu Fürstenberg and Army of the Danube.
- Kumioko for his work on Smedley Butler, Michael J. Daly and Michael P. Murphy.
The A-Class medal with Oak Leaves has been awarded to:
- Ian Rose for his work on Alexander Pentland, Oswald Watt and Roderic Dallas.

Editorial: Translating article writing to real life

I (Ed) am a college student in the United States, and as part of attaining my desired degree, I chose to take a course in Arab-Islamic history. We began in the early 600s and spent some time on the origins of the Islamic conquering of the Sassanid Empire and partial takeover of the Byzantine Empire (c. 634–750). From there, we have moved through the various ages of history, and the class recently began discussing the Ottoman Empire and other Islamic regions of more recent times.

As we began discussing the Ottoman Empire's role in the First World War, our professor mentioned that they were blockading the Bosphorus, using it as a chokepoint to cut off needed supplies traveling to Russia's only warm-water port, Sevastopol. An astute classmate, realizing this meant the use of warships, wondered what naval technology was like during this time. The professor turned and asked me to answer the question, as he knew I had been studying naval history and believed that I knew more about the subject.

The point of this anecdote is not to boast, but to provoke some thought. By virtue of the research Wikipedia writers must do to write complete, referenced articles, many of us are acquiring knowledge in specialized topics that can surpass even learned scholars. Wikipedia might even provoke some of us into becoming learned scholars through the subjects we find here. To profile one such case, take a look at Parsecboy.

Beginning in May 2007, he came across a few essentially empty stubs on German battleship classes. Nearly 3 years later, he's written or collaborated on more than forty articles rated as good or higher, including over a dozen featured articles and a featured list; the majority relate to German warships. The work Parsecboy has done for Wikipedia has had a tremendous impact on his academic career: to complete his undergraduate degree, Parsecboy is currently writing an Honors Thesis that will analyze the British and German battlecruiser squadrons during the First World War. Parsecboy plans to attend graduate school and continue his research in the area, culminating in a dissertation. He comments that "without a doubt, I would not have had nearly as much knowledge and interest in the topic, nor would I have known where to begin researching if I had not become so involved with the topic here on Wikipedia."

The knowledge you acquire through writing Wikipedia articles will remain with you for the rest of your life. Try to find a way to use it to your advantage.

—Ed (talk • majestic titan) and Parsecboy (talk)

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Protection policy

Not sure if you know or care about the conversation going here, but much of it seems to be centered around objections to your actions specifically, with two users making one proposal after another to limit or change protection policy. Whenever they are pressed about demonstrating the need for these changes your name seems to come back up. Just thought you should know. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm aware of it but not paying much attention YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? (Oh, and what's with the weird edits notice here?) --Apoc2400 (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The edit notice is an invitation to the photo poll above you YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:JaWandaWiggins

This user you blocked is currently requesting unblocking. For what it's worth, I'm not sure what called for an indefinite block without any warnings. Is there some reason we're not assuming good faith or trying to educate this user about proper practices? – Luna Santin (talk) 05:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes a hunch based on subtle contextual clues is enough. Or not so subtle clues, like accusing the blocking admin of racism without any basis to make such an accusation. This is a troll we've got here, I'm sure of it. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind an unblock but given his edit summary on VVS Laxman and his other vandalisms I don't think you'll get anything useful out of him YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My hunch seems to have been correct: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LeTroy89. I'm all for assuming good faith, but I'm also a fan of trusting my instincts, which screamed at me that this was a troll. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I get I suppose, the CU on the case just turned around and said that although LeTroy had several socks that JaWanda was "technically unrelated." Great.Beeblebrox (talk) 03:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SA

What do you think of my April 14 nomination?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths of old people aren't allowed unless it is a 100 yrs old, or an assassination etc, plane accident of an important guy. You'll have to find a date when they set some record. With all your landmarks, the opening date could be used. Is the inaug of Obama up there? YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are National Historic Landmark designation dates O.K.?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Since every United States President is inaugurated on the same day, I don't know that that is an appropriate day for any one of them.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pity about the inauguration. I think you could try one of those NHL dates, or perhaps the opening was more notable, I'm not sure. For the golden thing, I just noticed the part about the featured pic, so that rules things out. I will now give you a personal invitation to the photo poll above, given your status as the most prolific sports writer on wiki. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 06:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about my 1958 attempt at Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/April 15.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:17, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos

In the news: Wikipedia influences drug terminology, brief headlines

WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup

Features and admins: This week in approvals

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First Test 1948

Just a quick word. Bowes has a bit of stuff on this test if you would like me to add it on. Also, came across a little bit regarding the dropping of Hutton after the second Test due to him "flinching". I can add that to the second test article if you think it would be useful. And found a bit on Yardley which refers to these first two tests if that's any good! --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Yes please YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added some content from Bowes about English tactics and also added a bit from Wisden to give an English verdict on the massacre! You'll probably need to massage it a bit to make it fit better. Feel free to take anything out that doesn't work. Also added the info on Hutton to 2nd test article but again it may need tweaking as it feels a bit stuck on. The stuff on Yardley is more of a summary of his achievements in the whole series, so I'm not sure where it would go. It comes from Gibson's Cricket captains of England and it also claims that the selectors (i.e. Walter Robins) wanted to drop Yardley later in the series. Don't know how true this is. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And just to add some naked Yorkshire prejudice :) Is it worth pointing out in the background that Australia struggled against Yorkshire in the build up? --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all, the Invinicibles Doco talks quite a lot about the Yorkshire and Essex match YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aus

May I ask why? —Aaroncrick (talk) 07:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. But people seem to have had it YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 09:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid 56kb speed. Anyway, I'm not going to be around over Easter. Your days might be numbered? ... Hopefully that's not meant to mean what I think it does ... —Aaroncrick (talk) 10:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? It's taken 10 mins for your talkpage to load and I don't even get an answer. Silly monkey. Anyway, I nominated a FARC last night. The Indian arts have been annoying me for some time... so is Canberra ... you using refs from Australia? And yes, Hodge and Marsh would be better. —Aaroncrick (talk) 04:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, it's unfortunate to say but most people can't be bothered doing any more than teh bare minimum to get their star and won't fix an old article unless you threaten to confiscate their star. As for any projects, one people notice a trend of bad articles they can just keep on sequentially nomming a pile of articles by the said person or wikiproject, eg Nichalp's are always getting put up. Nevertheless, Yarralumla is just sitting around waiting, worse than Canberra, and fauna of Australia doesn't look good. Malleus has been down at WT:MHCOORD getting stuck into the cut-and-paste USS articles from DANFS, so maybe there might be a spree on the boat articles YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archived some of the sections of the poll which reached consensus. Maybe you can vote now :) YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's considerate of you. Should be fine soon. Tryin' to work out how to get a spell checker to work - I'm sure you can. I don't want to nom Aus articles, however. —Aaroncrick (talk) 06:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I just try and work on them from time to time so I don't see the point, but when the other unsourced articles get bumped off, if Australian ones aren't improved, the probability of them getting picked off rises YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 06:12, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iravan

I am planning a FAC for Iravan soon. Can you please check the WP:ALT (though it a temporary suspected FA criterion), as do did for Kanhoptra? Other suggestions for improvement are also welcome. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:32, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well you can get away with being brief as people don't seem to make sure that it is detailed as in the example on the policy page, eg List of international cricket centuries by Virender Sehwag has a pile of "Man in blue India uniform" type stuff. But it is optional anyway, but if you are going to bother might as well do it in detail. For the refs, dashing is needed still, I've done some, and your footnotes aren't consistent because of some with spacing after the p/pp. and some without. Another thing that sticks out is that the article switches between different spelling variations of his name. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Leah Poulton

On April 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leah Poulton, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to discussion

Hello, you are invited to take part in the following discussion on this topic. The discussion is about general ways to improve Wikipedia in terms of verfifiability of contents. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 20:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noted thanks YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Ping. –Moondyne 08:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. And do you have plans to reference Yagan more thoroughly, because it will end up at WP:FAR eventually because of modern requirements of more citation coverage YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

protetction of St. Joseph's Convent School, Sagar

Is the full edit protection at St. Joseph's Convent School, Sagar really needed? Rettetast (talk) 13:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to undo it if you feel appropriate, although Indian articles are rather lawless with most people only tending to their personal collection. Spam and vandalism are entrenced in amny school/organisation articles YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was the full edit protection that raised my eyebrows. Semi protection does not seem to be needed either since there is no history of IP-vandalism. Rettetast (talk) 12:31, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it must have been a mistake YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:39, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Rdeshmukh

You blocked this user, without warning, for "blanking" but I could not identify any edits of that sort. Rather, this user seemed to be engaged in some kind of article editing. Could you please explain, at User talk:Rdeshmukh, exactly why you blocked, why you did so without warning, and what the user should have done differently? Mango juice^talk 03:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah looks like he took care of himself YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archives