Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ângelo Correia
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Ângelo Correia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced biography of a living person — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnihilatorHeli (talk • contribs) 28 June 2011
- Keep. Do not delete this article. It would be a mistake.
- 1- Angelo Correia has been on the Portuguese language Wikipedia for years.
- 2- He was a Minister of the Portuguese Government under the leadership of Prime Minister Cavaco Silva.
- 3- He is a noted opinion maker and appears regularly in the Portuguese media (television and press).
Best regards.Mouramoor (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of reliable sources. If he's been in telvision and press, then can't I find any written articles online. I feel that one source may not be enough to sustain the article.Keep since notable sources have been added to the article. SwisterTwister talk 22:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. He is not only a former member of a national parliament, but also a former Minister of the Interior (a cabinet position) in Portugal. See list of ministers under 1981-1983. As such, he easily qualifies as notable under WP:POLITICIAN. A Google News Archive search turns up numerous references to him, mostly in Portuguese but some in English as well, which makes it relatively easy to verify his credentials. This article needs improvement, not deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow keep. Easily meets WP:POLITICIAN as a former member of a national legislature and holder of national office, as verified by reliable sources (Google translation). I will ask the nom and the one person who recommended deletion to reconsider their !votes but absent that I recommend WP:SNOW closure. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, speedy close. An object demonstration of the disruptiveness of initiating deletion processes while editors are trying to write new articles, as well as the importance of complying with WP:BEFORE. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball speedy keep and close - easily verifiable former MP and Minister. Article needs work, but deletion suggestion is ludicrous --Saalstin (talk) 20:17, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- strong keep Fist: Former minister. Second: a nomination after only 7 minutes is ridiculous, at least wait an hour to give the author a chance to finish the article. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 00:07, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - passes WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. I don't wish to assume bad faith about the nominator, but this was clearly a mistaken nomination: a quick search for sources would have demonstrated that he obviously meets our inclusion guidelines. Robofish (talk) 14:25, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.