Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1996 UCLA at Tennessee football game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1996 UCLA at Tennessee football game

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article is a run-of-the-mill regular season college football game. It does not warrant its own article. The notable details of this game can be sufficiently covered at 1996 UCLA Bruins football team and 1996 Tennessee Volunteers football team. Jweiss11 (talk) 07:35, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. JohnInDC (talk) 12:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Individual regular season college football games are not inherently notable per WP:SPORTSEVENT, and such individual CFB games must satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG to be suitable for inclusion, and that also means that coverage must exceed WP:ROUTINE post-game coverage of typical individual games. Pursuant to established precedents and consensus, individual regular season games should have some historical significance for a stand-alone article. Articles regarding individual regular season games are disfavored and discouraged; content regarding such individual regular season games generally should be incorporated into the parent articles about the season of the individual teams (see 1996 UCLA Bruins football team and 1996 Tennessee Volunteers football team). Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This game can be adequately covered at the year/team articles as noted by the nominator. Cbl62 (talk) 17:09, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator.--TMD Talk Page. 01:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a notable game. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 16:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly doesn't meet WP:NEVENT. ansh666 11:46, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this could be covered easily and better at a season article. I do ask that if it is deleted that the content actually be moved to those season articles.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.