Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Neuhausen am Rheinfall train collision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Neuhausen railway station. J04n(talk page) 00:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Neuhausen am Rheinfall train collision

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was "Fails per WP:EVENT". Eeekster (talk) 10:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As the original person who Prodded the article I tagged this as it fails per WP:EVENT. Yes this rail accident was tragic but with no deaths, and no lasting impact in the form of media or such, I do not see this passing wikipedia's notability guidelines. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 05:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep http://info.rsi.ch/home/channels/informazione/svizzera/info_on_line/2013/01/10-Sciaffusa_scontro_tra_due_treni

the article should be expanded! forget to take care of deleting the rail accidents!Robyc73 (talk) 01:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I would suggest that the article be merged with the Neuhausen am Rheinfall railway station article. According to subsequent media reports, the accident happened because one of the drivers went through a red signal, and the accident would likely have been prevented if the station had been fitted with the latest train detection equipment, which is scheduled to be installed there by 2020. (Detection equipment, cause.) Bahnfrend (talk) 02:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Many injuries. NickSt (talk) 17:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is that a criterion for keeping? Rcsprinter (post) @ 10:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This was a very minor accident with less than 20 injuries and no deaths. Media coverage was minimal. No lasting impact. Very few sources. There are thousands of accidents like this that do not have WP articles. Does not meet WP:GNG. Contents can be merged as suggested by Bahnfrend above. --Noleander (talk) 21:27, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JmaJeremy ✆✎ 21:10, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Neuhausen am Rheinfall railway station. No deaths and little media coverage, as evidenced by the few sources. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 23:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.