Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnes (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wrong forum. Liberty to list at WP:CP if desired. Stifle (talk) 14:32, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agnes (novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to have been translated from this page at inhaltsangabe.de, a source that does not license its content under a free license. Unfortunately it may thus be a copyright violation. —teb728 t c 22:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In my searches I've found three scholarly book sources and one peer reviewed journal entry on the novel. I can't do too much with the sources since I can barely make out the words in it. My German is fairly non-existent in general and the advanced wording in these sources are a bit beyond me. I can get the general gist of it though, and I can see where they'd be usable as reliable sourcing. This is just sort of the tip of the iceberg from what I can see, as it looks like it's considered to be a fairly big book in Germany and things such as this suggest that it's used as far as schooling/education goes. I'll add more as I find it, but offhand the sources would probably do better under the hand of a fluent German speaker. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:59, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've added quite a bit more, but I think I'll stop with this since I've established notability but cannot really read enough to really be able to do justice with the sources. I'll drop a note on the German WP for some help with the sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:17, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^*poke* 03:15, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 11:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:AFD is not the forum for copyright problems. No deletion arguments based on notability have been made. Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.