Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Flock
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:20, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Alexander Flock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:Notability for tennis players - no ATP Tour main draw matches played in, no ATP Challenger titles, not a world top three junior, and not junior grand slam event titles Mayumashu (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Seems notable.Hillcountries (talk) 10:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Under which of the criterion? Mayumashu (talk) 01:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:NTENNIS. Being a runner up in a minor tournament does not make you notable. Ravendrop (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.