Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Evjen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Daniel (talk) 23:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andreas Evjen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD: "plenty of coverage https://www.nb.no/search?q=%22Andreas%20Evjen%22&mediatype=aviser" Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and, I think, WP:GNG. Notwithstanding this vague wave towards some local, routine coverage in the National Library of Norway archives. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets NFOOTBALL by some way. Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 10:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even close to adequate sourcing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets NFOOTBALL comfortably and has coverage [1] [2] which is more than just a name check Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The games in 2001 were in the second tier - so NFOOTBALL is not met. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 11:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No clear consensus but some sources. Needs more discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 22:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per Spiderone. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.