Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Campbell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Snow. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 12:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Campbell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ONEEVENT --wooden superman 11:34, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - There are lots of other Western fighters in the Syrian conflict who have deservedly got Wikipedia pages, and usually they are not questioned. This article is perhaps not written very well, but I will go and tidy it up so that it meets guidelines. However, the subject is inherently encyclopaedic and should not be deleted. --Jwslubbock (talk) 12:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's just WP:OSE. Maybe they should be questioned - I think further scrutiny is needed. I can't see how she passes WP:NSOLDIER. --wooden superman 13:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has received serious press coverage in Britain. PatGallacher (talk) 18:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She's received lots of coverage in UK, and profiled in the NY Times. I don't consider this a WP:ONEEVENT because while she is being profiled as the first to die in the conflict, these articles read like obituaries. Her life is also being profiled here. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, and is part of the wider situation of foreign nationals participating in the on-going Syrian conflict. She plays a notable role in a major conflict and would thus seem to pass WP:ONEEVENT with the volume of coverage. Mattyjohn (talk) 22:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:SIGCOV carries her past WP:ONEEVENT which reads: "if an event is of sufficient importance, even relatively minor participants may require their own articles, for example, Howard Brennan, a witness to the JFK assassination."E.M.Gregory (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per E.M.Gregory| and Megalibrarygirl. Content and citations added since nomination show she meets notability requirements. Cheers! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 16:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per others. EkoGraf (talk) 06:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.