Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Azekwoh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 10:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Azekwoh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Young promising artist that fails WP:GNG HandsomeBoy (talk) 09:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — no in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 12:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete linkedin is a self-published source. [1] isn't by yahoo editors, but by Coindesk, which is listed at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources where it is noted that "There is consensus that CoinDesk should not be used to establish notability for article topics, and that it should be avoided in favor of more mainstream sources". The rest isn't much better.
Delete: It's WP:TOOSOON. Does not meet WP:NARTIST or GNG yet. Princess of Ara 14:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.