Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bathinda-Rohtak line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Discussion on whether and where to merge can continue editorially. Star Mississippi 15:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bathinda-Rohtak line

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet GNG as it does not have any WP:SIGCOV; all I can find is passing mentions. – Meena • 10:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and India. – Meena • 10:16, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is an active RfC at Wikipedia talk:Notability on individual station articles. Given a proposal from various users is to merge railway station content into line articles, it doesn't feel right to delete said line articles. These are also important from a navigational point of view. NemesisAT (talk) 11:35, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/merge I can find some coverage online about this line's electrification. I don't support outright deletion of this article. I wouldn't be opposed to a merge to Northern Railway zone, however, which would allow the merge to be undone if sufficient sourcing can be found. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No objection to a merge. Per my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiul-Barauni Section, it's not possible that sources do not exist for a 140-mile long railway line. Mackensen (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (not sure where). Not quite enough sourcing to warrant a standalone article, but would be happy to keep if more was found. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.