Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Tilney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Tilney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL JMHamo (talk) 23:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 23:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete For the reasons I PRODed it- not played a professional game, so fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep because while all of the above is true as of 29 May 2015, it will become untrue by August/September. The kid has just been given a senior football contract with Championship side, MK Dons [cited in article]. So yes, strictly according to the rules, the article should be deleted - but only for it to be created again in three months time. So I suggest we don't bother with the work to rule on this occasion. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- He's actually been on a contract with the club since last October and has not yet played a first team game, how can you be certain that he will be in the team come August/September.......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a Norwich fan, I know there are many players in their reserve squad who don't have articles, because they haven't played a competitive fixture. There's no evidence they'll make an appearance in 3 months time, and if they do, it can just be recreated then. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair comment. Delete.--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 01:02, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.