Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitherium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bitherium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

More non-notable blockchain garbage. No coverage, no indication this meets any type of criteria. (As a side note, can we get a CSD that covers this nonsense? she says somewhat jokingly but not really) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion Diptanshu 💬 12:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non notable indeed. Deletion - you know it makes sense. Nick (talk) 14:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'd rather not make a CSD crit because some of these are notable or borderline enough that consensus would be needed to determine.L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 18:30, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. --Sykes83 (talk) 23:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.