Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluebird's Illusion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bluebird's Illusion

procedural nomination Deleted via WP:PROD in Sept 2006; subsequently re-created and nominated for deletion via PROD in Aug 2007 (see this version) by User:Kariteh with the following reasoning: "Unofficial fangame which does not establish its notability." User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as repost, tagged as such.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Was the article subject to an actual deletion vote/discussion? If not, then previous deletion via proposed or speedy deletion are not sufficient to make the article a speedy candidate - it must meet the criteria on its own. That said, the article lists no references, and the only external link is not working (a parked domain), and has an Alexa rank of almost 1 million (highest ever about 30.000), so delete as not notable (and possibly speedy delete as {{db-group}}). - Mike Rosoft 21:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NN computer game. Article states: "it is rumored that there are only 100 copies in the world." Also, text is replete with weasel words, which is a sign that the editors creating the article cannot back up what they are typing. OfficeGirl 23:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per original prod reasoning, and probable lack of reliable sources. Google gives mostly Wikipedia mirrors, forums, and other unreliable sources. Since this is non-web-based software (i.e., a PC game that would apparently run standalone), I don't think that qualifies for speedy deletion criterion A7; in any event, it's probably best to establish a true AfD outcome so that future reposts, if any, can be speedily deleted per G4. — TKD::Talk 00:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless significant coverage from reliable, independent sources are found Corpx 04:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest merging it into a section about FMA media. Jack Cain 07:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It is already mentioned in the Fullmetal Alchemist article, and I suppose it should be removed from there as well. - Mike Rosoft 06:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.