Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna Tatiana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SNOW here... Tone 12:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brianna Tatiana

Prod removed by an IP with no explanation. Rationale is no significant coverage in reliable sources to meet notability guidelines and does not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:ENTERTAINER. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO ukexpat (talk) 00:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Totally non-notable. A few walk-ons, a CD announced to be released in 2007 that there are no Google hits for, a non-existant website used as a ref (along with that 2-year old press release), no way this person is notable enough to deserve an article. Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 01:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agreed that fails WP:BIO, but may be viable after future coverage. If there is future coverage, a new article may be appropriate. FrumpyTheClown (talk) 01:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 00:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn at this time, no verifiable sources for anything of notability. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 01:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No coverage in third party sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to find a single reliable source about this person. It should be deleted for failing to meet notability policy. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 01:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources whatsoever about the subject of a blp? Then no blp.Bali ultimate (talk) 01:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources at all! - Vartanza (talk) 02:48, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Found in IMDB.[1] Filmography roughly matches IMDB. Name disagrees with IMDB. Not found in Hollywood Reporter. Not found in Hollywood Creative Directory. Press release on PR Newswire regarding being signed by Global Village Records.[2]. According to an SEC litigation release [3], "Global Village Records" was part of a Ponzi scheme. "According to the complaint, even after the original defendants were enjoined from continuing to violate the federal securities laws, they continued their fraud by soliciting additional money into this scam. To circumvent the asset freeze, certain defendants created a new company, Global Village Records, and then used the bank accounts of companies owned by Daniel J. Merriman to forward money from investors." Let's just flush this article. --John Nagle (talk) 03:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Diggy diggy delete! no reliable secondary sources. She's either not notable or a hoax. Either way, make it disappear. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 06:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete echo above, snow? Verbal chat 09:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete And a snowy close. Hell, this AfD is pointless, the article is a textbook IAR speedy delete, someone should've just zapped it when the prod was contested by a drive-by. --M^ask? 09:48, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Anybody who has a name that rhymes like this should get an article. I am singing it now, "Brianna Tatiana, Tatiana Brianna". Drawn Some (talk) 11:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.