Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britpop revival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Britpop. Killiondude (talk) 06:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Britpop revival

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The notional genre of "Britpop revival" is always discussed in the reliable sources as being part of the history and development Britpop, not a separate phenomenon. Binksternet (talk) 05:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC) Binksternet (talk) 05:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Britpop or delete. Of course, it is hard to revive something that never really existed.--Rpclod (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Britpop. This is just another piece of history in the genre. Unless it becomes a gigantic phenomenon that develops it's own unique characteristics from Britpop, there is no need for a full article about it. Post-punk revival, for example, deserves its own article because it is a big phenomenon and is completely different from post-punk. This just seems the same. SuperLuigi22 (talk|contribs) 17:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.