Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSX milepost prefixes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to CSX Transportation. (CSX redirects there). (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CSX milepost prefixes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This incredibly niche topic is not at all notable, and nothing but unencyclopedic trivia. I have not found any reliable sources providing significant coverage of the topic. It's no wonder the only reference is to a forum (and therefore useless). When you remove Wikipedia mirrors, there's basically zero online about the topic. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete while I like railfanning, wikipedia is not for unfettered railfanning and this information is not encyclopedic and has no WP:RS. snood1205 23:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG as it has no significant coverage.Lectrician2 (talk) 02:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the first section (with or without the list) to an article about CSX lines if it can be reliably sourced, delete if it can't. The rest is much too niche for a general purpose encyclopaedia so there is no point even looking for sources. Thryduulf (talk) 14:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into CSX. The entire article isn't needed, but the general concept and the link at the top can probably be fit into CSX somewhere. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 00:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into CSX per post above. Would make a good section in main CSX article, but not stand-alone. Realkyhick (talk) 04:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.