Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C and M Mobile Home Park, Alabama
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- C and M Mobile Home Park, Alabama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is hardly remarkable. There are thousands of mobile home parks around the country, not sure why this one deserves its own page. Here's a Google Maps view of the place: https://goo.gl/maps/GtodqDXNPZef4r6p9 BigDwiki (talk) 00:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:15, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:15, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't think of how a trailer park could ever be notable. This one certainly isn't anyhow. Ajf773 (talk) 02:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No more notable than any of the other residential roads in the vicinity, or indeed anywhere.----Pontificalibus 06:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Listing in the GNIS is merely an acknowledgement that it appeared on a map at some point, in this case one prepared by the City of Mobile, Alabama. Absurd and risible to think this means this is notable. Fails GNG and NGEO - appearance in a database of anything that has been on a map in this country is not "legal recognition" and there are zero sources of any substance on this. Reywas92Talk 16:15, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and express wonderment as to how this article managed to survive for nine years with nobody noticing. Cosmic Sans (talk) 16:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete This is an encyclopedia not a dictionary. When the article tracks the inclusion of a name in another work this is the work of a very specialized and specific dictionary, not the work of an encyclopedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.