Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge Network
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cambridge Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Was an expired WP:PROD. After deletion User:Dsp13 came to my talk page and asked me to restore it. — Aitias // discussion 01:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I initiated the article, & added some refs when it was tagged WP:PROD, because I thought Cambridge Network was notable. But I live locally to Cambridge, & businesses etc. aren't the bit of wikipedia I know best, so I may well be biased in this regard. Dsp13 (talk) 09:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as notability seems to be established. If I am incorrect in my observation, than possibly merge to Silicon Fen. MuZemike (talk) 20:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sources establish notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.