Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassi Nova
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 02:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cassi Nova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article provides no evidence to show that the subject passes WP:PORNBIO criteria. Sharveet (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- This article does not meet the notibilty guidelines for pornographic actors.Joeycfc (talk) 07:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO/WP:PORNBIO. No reliable sources and no evidence of achievement in porn. • Gene93k (talk) 10:35, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:PORNBIO ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 01:59, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.