Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chainge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as the author and sole contributor has been blocked as a sock of a banned user. Hut 8.5 18:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chainge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor sourcing, either unreliable, not independent, or press releases or equivalent. Closer to advertising than an encyclopedia article. Citing (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Citing (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Citing (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Citing (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to have adequate sourcing to establish notability. Any content issues (although it looks pretty objective to me) can be fixed through clean-up. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I should have been more explicit and just cleaned out the unreliable sources first before submitting this to AfD (as I did here). This article was a clear case of citation bombing of trivial mentions, blogs and social media posts, cryptocurrency news sites, event listings, app websites, etc. Sweeping those away we're left with one reliable source, Yahoo Finance, which says: "Financial experts, such as Vlad Tirla, CPO of Chainge Finance," and then proceeds to talk about something else.Citing (talk) 04:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If the only independent WP:RS is the Yahoo Finance article, then coverage is insufficient to meet WP:NCORP. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.