Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chia Black Dragon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn‎. ✗plicit 14:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chia Black Dragon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. toweli (talk) 13:08, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature. toweli (talk) 13:08, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Covered in some books here and here, which give critical evaluation of the series; also some sections in magazines [1]. Some are entries on the author but they primarily talk about the series. In any case if this is kept it should be retitled as a series and structured around that instead of the main character. I found several interviews with the author talking about the series and individual books on Newspapers.com and several things more or less saying it was published and little else. They contain little evaluative material and are questionable independence wise but would be useful for building the article. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I refocused the article from a character article to a fantasy series article, removing a bunch or OR and PLOT in the process. – sgeureka ^t•c 10:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I added reception. The St. James source could be used a lot more, it's pretty extensive, however this is about as much work as I'm willing to do here. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination due to the identification of sources. Thank you PARAKANYAA and sgeureka for improving the article. toweli (talk) 13:41, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.