Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicha's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Chicha's

The result was Speedied G7. GoldenRing (talk) 10:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An eighteen month old restaurant with routine reviews is not, of itself, notable. WP is not a restaurant guide. Rhadow (talk) 17:14, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:59, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or even speedy delete under G10. Not notable, no matter how you slice it. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 03:05, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.