Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Childrens center of lake forest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete CSD A7. I am not SALTing this article for now, but I would do it in case of reinstantiation. --Angelo (talk) 16:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Childrens center of lake forest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Spam, author(s) keep recreating article after deletion Amaryllis25 "Talk to me" 03:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete under G11, A1, or A7. All three I think would apply and there is little reason to bring the issue here. May want to salt it as well. Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if not speedy. No notability even for random schools, let alone daycare centres and articles written like that. digitalemotion 04:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It was speedied a couple times already, author keeps recreating it. Amaryllis25 "Talk to me" 04:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non notable, and salt them both. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and salt both of them, and indefblock the author--an obvious SPA. Blueboy96 04:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, without SALT. If the author recreates again, Delete and SALT both articles and ban him. --The Fifth Horseman (talk) 07:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete SALT the article. Maybe give the User one more chance. Alberon (talk) 10:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If high schools can have entries in Wikipedia, there is no reason why this respected establishment for children cannot also secure a notable place in Wikipedia. Batright (talk) 13:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- User's 9th edit. Blueboy96 16:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.