Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrus View, California
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 22:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Citrus View, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A name taken off some random map and applied to what used to be a farm field and is now apparently salt-ruined. NOt even clear there was any such place, but it certainly wasn't here, so this is a huge GNG fail. Mangoe (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete When the GNIS entry isn't even sourced to the topos, that's a bad sign. Hog Farm Bacon 18:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NGEO. // Timothy :: talk 17:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - clearly fails WP:GNG and almost definitely fails WP:GEOLAND as well Spiderone 18:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.